Go Back   HondaSwap Forums > Members' Corner > Computers, Games, Electronics etc

Solidworks vs Pro/e

Welcome, Guest! Please Register or Login:
  

Members have access to more features, better search, and see fewer ads! It's free, what are you waiting for?

Once You Know, You Newegg
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-11-2006, 10:50 AM   #1
Super Moderator
 
CRX-YEM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Wallingford, CT
Age: 32
Posts: 4,472
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride:  91 CRX
Rep Power: 87
CRX-YEM has much to be proud ofCRX-YEM has much to be proud ofCRX-YEM has much to be proud ofCRX-YEM has much to be proud ofCRX-YEM has much to be proud ofCRX-YEM has much to be proud ofCRX-YEM has much to be proud ofCRX-YEM has much to be proud of
Send a message via ICQ to CRX-YEM Send a message via AIM to CRX-YEM Send a message via Yahoo to CRX-YEM myspace  FaceBook
Default Solidworks vs Pro/e

I know that there is a small base of engineers here and we are looking to migrate away from autocad t oa real 3d cad program. I've had a demo of solidworks 2007 pretty impressive, doesn't really look like there is a really large learing curve, just really keping your mind set on UCS and parametrics. The Cosmos integration is rather nice as well for doinf FEA's. So I'd like to here from some of you that have had experience with both systems. From what I gather they say Pro/e has a 1 year learning curve vs Sloidworks at a 6mos. A majority of our product are small single piece designs, we re getting more involved with multipiece assemblies, with that in mind what do you guys think ??
__________________
Dennis


Please don't PM/Email/IM me for technical support. Make a Post!!!

91 CRX DX, 03 Civic EX

"There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who get binary and those who don't."

"Of all my imaginary friends I don't think there was one I didn't end up having to kill"

CRX-YEM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:46 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Citizen_Insane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 3,701
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Rep Power: 52
Citizen_Insane will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to Citizen_Insane
Default

I've worked with both a little. ProE is definatly more powerful, but solidworks is very easy and intuitive to use if you don't have to do anything too complex. If you're designing a whole car or something you might want to go with ProE...if you're designing an a-arm, solidworks is fine. I work for 3M and we use solidworks for designing our plastic parts.
Citizen_Insane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 06:54 PM   #3
HS Troll...And Mod
 
reikoshea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Age: 24
Posts: 10,938
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride:  2001 Honda S2000
Rep Power: 254
reikoshea has a reputation beyond repute
reikoshea has a reputation beyond reputereikoshea has a reputation beyond reputereikoshea has a reputation beyond reputereikoshea has a reputation beyond reputereikoshea has a reputation beyond reputereikoshea has a reputation beyond reputereikoshea has a reputation beyond reputereikoshea has a reputation beyond repute
myspace
Default

was it engineering desktop or was it inventor that was just this crazy ass learning curve that took 3 hours to make a part you could make in 15 minutes in autocad (not really that bad, but you get what im talking about). I havent used ProE but Solidworks is a good piece of software. as a novice designer (meaning i took 3 years of mechanical design in high school and 2 years in college) Solidworks was freakin cool.
reikoshea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2006, 07:47 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: madison, WI
Age: 31
Posts: 1,236
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride:  1996 civic dx
Rep Power: 53
chestercheeto48 has much to be proud ofchestercheeto48 has much to be proud ofchestercheeto48 has much to be proud ofchestercheeto48 has much to be proud ofchestercheeto48 has much to be proud ofchestercheeto48 has much to be proud ofchestercheeto48 has much to be proud ofchestercheeto48 has much to be proud of
Default

In the High school classes I teach we use inventor but i have been trained on pro/e and have used solidworks. it is hard at first but when you catch on you can do some amazing shit.
chestercheeto48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2006, 10:53 AM   #5
Gonzo Scientist
 
TommyTheCat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Age: 24
Posts: 1,164
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride:  '04 Infiniti G35x
Rep Power: 37
TommyTheCat is a glorious beacon of lightTommyTheCat is a glorious beacon of lightTommyTheCat is a glorious beacon of lightTommyTheCat is a glorious beacon of lightTommyTheCat is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Im not sure what the question is. But I say get used to changing between them. I cant tell if you're tyring to decide what to buy for a company or your spare time or whatever.

As far as I've seen though, CATIA we had at school looked pretty bad-ass for making single parts and then integrating them. Its entire file/gui/etc structure was set-up around that.
TommyTheCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2006, 08:45 AM   #6
Admin with a big stick
 
Calesta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas / Fort Worth, TX
Age: 32
Posts: 25,391
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride:  2003 S2000
Rep Power: 391
Calesta has a reputation beyond repute
Calesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Calesta
Default

I prefer Pro/E, but they haven't updated their software package in years, and SolidWorks updates every year.

I've never sat down to use SolidWorks much, but let's just say that UT now teaches SolidWorks in the freshman CAD class alongside AutoCAD. Pro/E stays as an upper division and graduate level course.

My company experience:
Lockheed Martin uses a lot of Pro/E as does Ford
Halliburton uses a ton of SolidWorks
Calesta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 12:17 PM   #7
Blah blah blah....
 
MikeBergy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Coast, CALI
Age: 29
Posts: 3,655
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Rep Power: 50
MikeBergy is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to MikeBergy
Default

Solidworks/Catia are two amazing packages, but they do have their quirks in assembly mode, when you have a LOT of parts. We had 1000+ parts in our Solidworks aircraft design. ProE is nice, but I don't recall if there were any analysis tools integrated into it. I think it was a more expensive SW package than SolidWorks. I give SolidWorks a big two thumbs up after using it for about 2 years. If you are looking for options that are more closely related to CAD, Kubotech's KeyCreator is good also, and lets you do things more along the lines of AutoCad. There is a crapload of constraints in SolidWorks when you are creating parts, i.e. no free floating lines and whatnot, while KeyCreator will let you do just about anything, it's more like 3D drawing than the others, which are more solid in nature, obvious from the names. Catia is used by Boeing, and is probably considered the best package you can get, but it is expensive as hell.
__________________
-1991 Integra, lots of goodies in an otherwise stock looking motorp; ITR front brakes.
-Xenocron programmable ecu w/datalogging port, LM-1 wideband, and Moates Ostrich are tuning tools of choice.

RIP 2005 Red Yamaha R6

www.m24x.com - Rocket Motorsports: For more technical engine discussions...

Quote:
Radar will bounce off of a ride that is shiny and you keep clean.
Please don't PM me with tech questions. Use the forums!
MikeBergy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2006, 11:05 PM   #8
Admin with a big stick
 
Calesta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas / Fort Worth, TX
Age: 32
Posts: 25,391
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride:  2003 S2000
Rep Power: 391
Calesta has a reputation beyond repute
Calesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond reputeCalesta has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Calesta
Default

Pro/E doesn't have the analysis tools integrated into it, but the tools that come as part of the whole PTC package (Pro/Mechanica etc) all plug into Pro/E and work to do pretty much anything you want.
Calesta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2006, 11:49 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
ScrapinSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,284
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Rep Power: 49
ScrapinSi will become famous soon enoughScrapinSi will become famous soon enough
Default

We use SolidEdge at our work. It has a learning curve, but is a great databse type system, with great features.
ScrapinSi is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fun with Pro/E GSRCRXsi Computers, Games, Electronics etc 15 03-17-2005 02:35 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.x
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO
© 2001-2009 HondaSwap.com
One of the largest message boards on the web !  | a SkeyMedia Network site

Advertise on Hondaswap.com