A Honda & Acura Forum and technical discussion board. Topics include hybrid and swap information, turbo installation, tuning, ecu chipping, jdm parts and accessories, suspension setups and much more. Join us at HondaSwap.com
|
|||||||
|
Welcome, Guest! Please Register or Login:
Members have access to more features, better search, and see fewer ads! It's free, what are you waiting for? |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#2 |
|
The Trisexual
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The asshole of the USA, New Jersey
Age: 21
Posts: 8,859
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: 2007 Civic, 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Rep Power: 121
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
gsr
__________________
DO NOT PM ME WITH TECH QUESTIONS!!! Current Rides 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee =I love this truck 2007 Civic =Not sure what the future holds for this Previous 1992 Civic DX Hatch = 1994 B18B1 Turbo Rebuilt Garrett .60/.48 T3, log style mani and DIY downpipe, DSM 440's, kteller IC piping, JRC Intercooler, Home Depot style oil lines, HKS BOV, Crome Tuned, 253whp 1994 Civic VX Hatch, 1992 b18a1 swap 1993 Civic CX Hatch, 2000 B18b1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
The Kicker of Elves.
|
![]()
__________________
Don't misinterpret what I say. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
The Kicker of Elves.
|
Exactly. Shorter gears mean faster acceleration. The GSR transmission is pretty much a compromise between an LS and B16 transmission. Long gears being better for boost is a myth.
__________________
Don't misinterpret what I say. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
in my experience the gsr isnt as good as the ls. in a high hp fwd ap the longer gears help the car keep traction (not always). the car im speaking of is a 550hp car. it started with a gsr and pulled 11.4 @128 and with the ls it pulled 10.63 @136 so if shorter gears are better for all applications why doesnt this guy get a b16 and get a shorter gear set? I never said that i though the gsr was a bad idea, just that i didnt like it. but i guess for a street car the gsr wouldnt be a bad idea.
__________________
94 Accord, JDM h22a, cia, bold fab header, 3in cat, 2.5in catback, Limited Slip, Hondata s200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Trisexual
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The asshole of the USA, New Jersey
Age: 21
Posts: 8,859
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: 2007 Civic, 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Rep Power: 121
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I can see a long argument if I put another 2 cents in. I'm fairly tired so I'll respond tomorrow.
__________________
DO NOT PM ME WITH TECH QUESTIONS!!! Current Rides 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee =I love this truck 2007 Civic =Not sure what the future holds for this Previous 1992 Civic DX Hatch = 1994 B18B1 Turbo Rebuilt Garrett .60/.48 T3, log style mani and DIY downpipe, DSM 440's, kteller IC piping, JRC Intercooler, Home Depot style oil lines, HKS BOV, Crome Tuned, 253whp 1994 Civic VX Hatch, 1992 b18a1 swap 1993 Civic CX Hatch, 2000 B18b1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||||
|
The Kicker of Elves.
|
Quote:
![]() For the 90% of people who aren't building for much more than 300whp, the GSR is the best compromise of long gears and short gears. I kinda thought that was obvious for why I didn't recommend a B16 transmission. But, since it wasn't, many people feel that the B16 transmission is geared too high to use as a daily driver because of where it puts the RPMs on the freeway or highway. The long gears of the LS are good for gas mileage and top speed, but not so good for acceleration. So, you'd want to find a compromise that wouldn't require changing gears around inside the transmission. That would be the GSR transmission. ![]()
__________________
Don't misinterpret what I say. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Junior Member
|
i was actually told to do a GSR trans with a type-r final drive. is that a good idea?? and i was also wonderin if anyone had any tips because im putting it into an EF civic hatch and dont know how thats gonna work since the EF has a cable driven clutch. any help is greatly appreciated. thanks guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
you get the BRAKE
|
Not so true Scott. Depending on the turbo size he runs, if he is driving this car daily it would not be very enjoying to drive a turbo ls that will be spooling (depending on the turbo size) roughly around 3500-4000 rpm. For example, if he were going 80 mph in 5th gear with a gsr transmission, his rpm will be at 4,000. That would cause more wear on the turbo itself. Ive had both and I prefer the LS transmission especially for DD. Much better fuel economy and a more comfortable experience.
__________________
eg hatch (jdm b16) sold 1999 Yamaha YZF R6 (modded) http://hondaswap.com/engine-building...ow-pics-102486 sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
you get the BRAKE
|
Now if he wants to race light to light or at the track constantly, the shorter gears are the way to go. For driving distance, its beat.
__________________
eg hatch (jdm b16) sold 1999 Yamaha YZF R6 (modded) http://hondaswap.com/engine-building...ow-pics-102486 sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
The Trisexual
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The asshole of the USA, New Jersey
Age: 21
Posts: 8,859
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: 2007 Civic, 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Rep Power: 121
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm glad I came back with the responses I wanted to hear/ Now I don't have to start my argument.
I agree and disagree with ya LSVTEC, since I too have had both transmissions on my LST. My second turbo spooled up around 3.5-4k and I still recommend the GSR. The GSR was noticeably quicker. Sure I was in boost on the highway but the car was just faster and obviously had much better pull with the shorter gears which is what most people want. The LS still just seemed too long to me, I said differently back then but that's cause I couldn't afford another GSR trans after the ring gear sheared off half it's teeth and I wanted to make myself feel better about having to have the LS.
__________________
DO NOT PM ME WITH TECH QUESTIONS!!! Current Rides 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee =I love this truck 2007 Civic =Not sure what the future holds for this Previous 1992 Civic DX Hatch = 1994 B18B1 Turbo Rebuilt Garrett .60/.48 T3, log style mani and DIY downpipe, DSM 440's, kteller IC piping, JRC Intercooler, Home Depot style oil lines, HKS BOV, Crome Tuned, 253whp 1994 Civic VX Hatch, 1992 b18a1 swap 1993 Civic CX Hatch, 2000 B18b1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
you get the BRAKE
|
Like I have said many times in the past, it is all about what the owner of the car wants. Fuel economy and comfort without having to be in boost in 5th gear driving @ 80mph, or more accelleration with shorter gears. Either way, your gonna go fast.
![]()
__________________
eg hatch (jdm b16) sold 1999 Yamaha YZF R6 (modded) http://hondaswap.com/engine-building...ow-pics-102486 sold |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||
|
The Kicker of Elves.
|
If you want to sacrifce 1st-4th for a comfortable 5th, that's all on you.
What do you say to the person who has the GT28RS that's fully spooled by 2500rpm? Which transmission would be the best for them to keep them out of boost on the highway? Compromise. You can't have your cake and eat it too, unless you feel like building yourself a custom transmission.
__________________
Don't misinterpret what I say. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
The name's Sam
|
Depends on the purpose of the car. If it is a drag car I would say si tranny, if it is an autocross car I would have to say gsr personally I wouldn't go with the ls tranny unless you want better gas mileage. lol if you want better gas mileage buy a d-series motor. lol
__________________
Parts for sale: http://hondaswap.com/parts-sale-trad...-parts-115446/ Build Threads: Civic: http://hondaswap.com/civic-del-sol-eg-ek/d16y8-n-build-112401/5.html Trans Am: http://hondaswap.com/other-vehicle-discussions/1980-trans-am-build-thread-oh-yeah-its-official-149941/#post1054318 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
The Trisexual
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The asshole of the USA, New Jersey
Age: 21
Posts: 8,859
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: 2007 Civic, 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Rep Power: 121
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
if it's any type of race car te b16 tranny would be the best trans unless you're car has has enough power to top the trans out before the 1/4 mile is up or there are super long straighaways on the course your running.
__________________
DO NOT PM ME WITH TECH QUESTIONS!!! Current Rides 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee =I love this truck 2007 Civic =Not sure what the future holds for this Previous 1992 Civic DX Hatch = 1994 B18B1 Turbo Rebuilt Garrett .60/.48 T3, log style mani and DIY downpipe, DSM 440's, kteller IC piping, JRC Intercooler, Home Depot style oil lines, HKS BOV, Crome Tuned, 253whp 1994 Civic VX Hatch, 1992 b18a1 swap 1993 Civic CX Hatch, 2000 B18b1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
The Kicker of Elves.
|
Coming back to this. I really don't see why people have such a problem with being a 4k at 80mph. Both my Si and 325i sit just below 4k at 80mph. So what? They aren't old school domestics with a 5k redline.
__________________
Don't misinterpret what I say. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 89
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: 97 EX with B18B
Rep Power: 3
![]() |
Ok, I am building or my ls turbo a gsr trans with lsd and using the 4th and 5th gears from an LS trans that way I have the best of both worlds. I think this gives my the highway economy I want but the lower gear to tear it up with. If you got the money this is the way to go in my mind.
__________________
Yes, That is me on the bike in my Avatar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Senior Member
|
What about in my situation. Ill be running Full 3" Ex. Garrett T3/60-1 .48 a/r and I wanted good fuel economy, not spooling on highway and good acceleration??? Elvis I think thats a good idea for my situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
The Trisexual
|