pellets are 60% more effective in size per energy, are easier to maintain (little ash, auto-feeder via auger) and are 0-carbon. meaning, the natrual decay of the sawdust, etc they are made out of would have produced the same co2 decomposing as they would burning them.
you cannot say the same thing for wood.
By being smart and investing in a pellet stove? Stone age is using a woodburning stove. But even then I know people with acres of land and can get their own wood.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.