American Justice

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

I dont understand what he did wrong.

Is this illegal?

Emory manipulated the video to make it appear that the kids were listening to the dirty song that was rife with sexual innuendo and explicit lyrics. He then posted the video on Youtube.

Seems to me the police just overreacted. Im sure this will be thrown out of court because no crime was actually committed, and no children actually listened to the song.
 
The idea is that now these children are implicated in the peformance of an explicit song,without their consent. That is NOT legal.
 
The idea is that now these children are implicated in the peformance of an explicit song,without their consent. That is NOT legal.

Are the faces of the children shown or just the back of their heads? Each kid will look totally different by the time the lawsuit wraps up - lil ones grow quickly.
 
The guy is a DB for sure, but not a criminal. That being said, if my child was In that video I would take a trip to that comedy club, wait outside and beat him without mercy.
 
Might as well rape a women or shoot a man, hell, rob a bank, you'll get less years in jail.
 
I agree that our society has become overly litigious...point being, the felony sex charge.

However, I see that we have perverted the perversion of free speech to the point of thinking that this man somehow has the right to use people's images in a manner other than what they may have released to him.
 
I can see the point of view that this is similar to photoshopping someone's face into a porn without their consent, but do we REALLY need to make that illegal? I mean with computer video editing these days, you can make anything look like anything, so why should we care?

Both sides of this "crime" need to be issued a swift kick to the nuts and told to chill the fuck out.
 
So did he use copyrighted video footage intended for something else? I wonder if he had used (or did use) public domain footage... Then they couldn't claim it was unintended use.

I haven't seen the video so I don't know quite how explicit it is... It's probably douchebaggery, but just trying to figure out the actual lawbreaking part here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top