Marijuana smoking tied to testicular cancer

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

E_SolSi

Member of the 20 nut club
Moderator
VIP
:lmao:

Marijuana smoking tied to testicular cancer: study | Reuters

(Reuters) - Young men who had smoked marijuana recreationally were twice as likely to be diagnosed with testicular cancer than men who have never used marijuana, according to a U.S. study.


Researchers whose findings appeared in the journal Cancer said the link appeared to be specific to a type of tumor known as nonseminoma.


"This is the third study consistently demonstrating a greater than doubling of risk of this particularly undesirable subtype of testicular cancer among young men with marijuana use," said Victoria Cortessis of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, who led the study.


"I myself feel like we need to take this seriously now," she added, noting that the rates of testicular cancer have been rising inexplicably over the past century.


The research isn't ironclad proof that the marijuana is to blame, and even if it is, the danger isn't overwhelming. According to the American Cancer Society, a man's lifetime risk of getting testicular cancer is about one in 270 - and because effective treatment is available, the risk of dying from the disease is just one in 5,000.


So far, little is known about what causes it. Cortessis said undescended testicles, in which the testes remain in the abdomen beyond the age of a year, are a risk factor. Both pesticide and hormone exposure have also been associated with the tumors.


Cortessis and her colleagues used data from 163 young men who had been diagnosed with testicular cancer and nearly 300 men in a comparison group without the disease. Both groups had been interviewed about their health and drug use between 1987 and 1994.


Among the men with cancer, 81 percent had used marijuana at some point, whereas that was the case for 70 percent of the comparison group.


By contrast, cocaine use was linked to a smaller risk of the tumors. That's important because it signals that men who have been diagnosed with cancer aren't just more honest about their drug use, thereby creating a spurious link between marijuana and cancer, Cortessis said.


It's not entirely clear how marijuana would influence men's cancer risk, but Cortessis said developing testicles may somehow respond to the drug's main active ingredient.


The new study is "interesting," said Carl van Walraven of the University of Ottawa in Canada, who has studied testicular cancer, but said it has a number of limitations.


For instance, it didn't find an increased risk among men with higher marijuana use, and it was relatively small.


But Cortessis highlighted the consistent results from all the studies so far.
"It is hard to imagine a scenario whereby it is due to chance and I can't think of a systematic bias that would cause this. I will feel very confident that this is cause and effect once we have worked out the biology," she said. SOURCE: bit.ly/UEE61v


but hey... you can probly get a prescription for medical marijuana to deal with the cancer treatment
:lmao:
 
so lemme get this right
Among the men with cancer, 81 percent had used marijuana at some point, whereas that was the case for 70 percent of the comparison group.
maybe its too early and i'm reading this wrong, but it sounds about similar to asking people with cancer if they ever drank coffee and then blaming coffee for the cancer
 
thats what i was thinking too.

this is inconclusive at best.
 
responses from 2 of the guys i work with

Ed - "Fuck it, I don't need em anyway"


Kevin -
26557518.jpg



:lmao:
 
What's funny is that some would actually try to use this as an argument against legalizing weed, yet what percentage of people that smoke cigarettes get lung cancer? What percentage of people that drink get cirrhosis?
 
:concur:
i say legalize everything and let people make their own damn decisions
 
free drugs for the addicts
every 4th batch is fatal
russian roulette
cant afford it? roll the dice
let nature handle this shit
 
free drugs for the addicts
every 4th batch is fatal
russian roulette
cant afford it? roll the dice
let nature handle this shit

No need for that, just let companies make drugs and compete, bring prices down, and watch crime reduce itself. Prices for drugs are artificially high because drug dealers, and the government want them that way. If drugs weren't ridiculously expensive people would run their lives into the ground trying to buy them, and turn to crime, no crime, no need for paramilitary police forces, no need for billion dollar anti drug budgets.
 
So much win came from a thread about a bullshit article/study. I agree with everything said.

If you wanna gack up 5 8-balls and kill yourself, have at it. When you break into my house to pay for the habit is when it becomes a problem.
 
terrible article. i think they were bored and just wanted to get some hype. the "news" itself was incredibly vague and lacked any substance. basically it just said, "researcher from USC said maybe it can cause cancer, but they have no idea if it does or does not. it just correlates." WTF? If you read the abstract, it even indicates cocaine has a negative impact on testicular cancer. So maybe everyone should do cocaine now.

Population-based case-control study of recreational drug use and testis cancer risk confirms an association between marijuana use and nonseminoma risk - Lacson - 2012 - Cancer - Wiley Online Library


lastly, even if weed does make your balls fall off, it would probably have to be a ridiculous amount as some of pointed out. just browse the california prop 65 list.

http://oehha.ca.gov/prop65/prop65_list/files/p65single072012.pdf

things that will give you cancer:
-fiber glass used in information technology and telecommunications.
-coconut oil used in shampoos and cosmetics.
-artificial coloring
-carbon from bbqs
-ACE inhibitors in heart medicine for hypertension and cardiac failure.
-salted fish in chinese food.
-camphor oil used for indian cuisine.
-filling up your gas tank.

this list is mostly retarded because 1) it does not give the necessary dosage and exposure time. 2) most likely created, maintained and operated by lobbyists.

and just to spark some thought, interest, or curiosity. diet coke and orbitz gum gives you cancer. or it did. actually it doesnt. wait it might still though.

Aspartame controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
List of Products Containing Aspartame | Supersweet blog
 
Back
Top