| a SkeyMedia Network site
A Honda & Acura Forum and technical discussion board. Topics include hybrid and swap information, turbo installation, tuning, ecu chipping, jdm parts and accessories, suspension setups and much more. Join us at HondaSwap.com
|
|||||||
|
Welcome, Guest! Please Register or Login:
Members have access to more features, better search, and see fewer ads! It's free, what are you waiting for? |
|
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Watanabe Whore!!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Meriden, CT, USA
Age: 37
Posts: 10,146
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: datsuns & Subarus
Rep Power: 217
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Try as you might, it's hard to keep the first flight of a new airplane secret, but give Honda full marks for trying. The automotive giant's foray into the bizjet market flew for about an hour from its not-so-secret development facility at Aero Atlantic's FBO at Greensboro-Peidmont Triad International Airport (GSO) last Wednesday. And although the flight has been widely reported, Honda and the various entities involved have clearly been sworn to secrecy about the milestone. "Tell them I referred you to Honda," said a slightly bemused Don Godwin, CEO of Atlantic Aero. Honda's official spokesman Jeffrey Smith didn't return a phone message left by AVweb. Word (anonymously, of course) is that Wednesday's hop was a shakedown in advance of the official rollout that could happen later this week or next. The jet has an odd engine configuration, with the Honda-developed mills resting atop wing-mounted pylons. This makes way for a roomier cabin. Earlier, Honda announced the eight-passenger jet would gross out at 9,200 pounds, cruise at 420 knots up to 44,000 feet and have an IFR range of 1,100 nm.
Honda is in the initial planning stages of building a jet similar in size to Cessna's CJ1. This aircraft is planned to have metal wings and empennage (tail assembly) with a composite fuselage. Honda will be developing its own engine for the aircraft that will have a thrust similar to the Williams FJ44-1, but is expected to have improved fuel efficiency, a high thrust-to-weight ratio, and Honda reliability. Looks like I might need to go get a job for Honda now... __________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Running on two cylinders
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southbridge, MA
Age: 25
Posts: 18,155
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Ride: 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer RPW E5 Coupe
Rep Power: 337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
sweet. honda sticks its fingers into everything!
does it have vtec? __________________
Home of the RPW built 2000 Lancer CC Coupe. See what is done to the little Evo5. "If you don't like what I've done with my car, I will gladly refund all the money you put into it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Cogito Ergo Sum Steampunk
|
If it had cams
![]() -> Steve __________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Watanabe Whore!!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Meriden, CT, USA
Age: 37
Posts: 10,146
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: datsuns & Subarus
Rep Power: 217
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, the wife has been telling me about it for a while...she knew about it for a while, I just never looked until it just made my AVweb newsletter...now I'm stoked.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
This first thing that comes to my mind is....
WHERE CAN I GET THE MOUNT KIT TO SWAP IT INTO MY CIVIC! ![]() __________________
It's back! Keep up on the progress of my cars! http://civicminded.wordpress.com/ Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
|
just looks like any other plane to me... cept with the jet engiens on top of the wing.
__________________
my <a href=\'http://www.hondaswap.com/gallery/browse.php?album_id=668\' target=\'_blank\'>civic</a> can burn stationwagons.....when they're parked |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Senior Member
|
I'm at work, no Photoshop.. but dang I want to see a picture of one of those jet engines in/on top of/behind a Civic
![]() __________________
It's back! Keep up on the progress of my cars! http://civicminded.wordpress.com/ Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
Whats with the engines over the top? Seems to me that with the engines at that angle, that they provide a high amount of downward thrust... Hmmmm...
The nose is very long, and appears to have a great aerodynamic to it, but from the size of the plane, I think a dual turboprop would be a better setup, dont you clayton? __________________
this country is turning into a bunch of fucking pussies... if this keeps up, pretty soon we'll be singing the french national anthem. -E_SolSi |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
92 hatch, b18c block b16 head rsr GT-II exhaust, skunk2 valvetrain. skunk2 manifold <span style=\'font-size:14pt;line-height:100%\'><span style=\'color:red\'> Michael Moore...You've just been pwnd'</span></span> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
FüK-VTEC
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 23
Posts: 8,409
iTrader: 3 / 100%
Ride: 07 Nissan Frontier, 90 CRX Si, 06 ZX6R racebike, chopped-out 02 Yamaha V-Star
Rep Power: 189
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
wow, a honda that actually needs a huge-ass wing.
but here's the real question.... do they make euros for it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Hehe, I didn't even see that comment. ![]() Would be funny though: 'Ladies and Gentlemen, we're now at full throttle, taking off and heading towards Dallas. I know the engines sound different right now but don't worry, we just hit VTEC. Should be a calm flight, we don't expect to meet up with any ricers looking to drag fly. Hopefully we won't get pestered by the cops about the altezzas. Sit back and enjoy your flight.' __________________
It's back! Keep up on the progress of my cars! http://civicminded.wordpress.com/ Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Watanabe Whore!!!
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Meriden, CT, USA
Age: 37
Posts: 10,146
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: datsuns & Subarus
Rep Power: 217
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Granted they both run on a turbine, but the Weight to power ratio...goes to the Jets.... and less moving parts to worry about. Economically speaking..turboprop engines consume less, but need to work harder...but it is up to the designer on how he feels the aircraft should be propelled....me, I prefer jets, simple little engines...turbo props have way to many parts to inspect and maintain. Cost wize..the jets are more exspencive. __________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
![]() __________________
the jewish guy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Senior Member
|
The only problem that I see with the top mounted jet design is the fact that the fuel system will have to run at higher pressure inorder to feed those babies (because they are above the tanks in the wings for those of you who don't work at the airport...) I can't wait for Paul Allen to buy one of these and fly into my FBO.
On a side point, how many of you guys are connected with the Aviation industry on this board? __________________
2003 Infiniti G35 1992 Civic Si Hatch JDM B18C, with a B16 head, and B16 Tranny on P30 ECU Civic Type R Cams on stock valve train, uprgade to Skunk2 IM soon... AEM SRI, Greddy 4-2-1 header, 5-Zigen Fireball Catback H&R Race Drop, KYB AGX 4 way adjustable Shocks 00 GSR Wheels in Goodyear GS-D F1s Skunk2 Upper Control Arms EBP paint 1996 Civic CX Hatch - R.I.P Dec. 26, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Senior Member
|
If you count the fact that I fly at least 1-2 times a month... And that I used to be big into planes when I was younger.EDIT: And btw... I also agree with your statements on the fuel pressure that will be needed... But it isn't that difficult... After all, MD makes planes with the 3rd engine mounted in the aft of the plane, above the fuselage. __________________
this country is turning into a bunch of fucking pussies... if this keeps up, pretty soon we'll be singing the french national anthem. -E_SolSi |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
WRX Sellout
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The left lane
Age: 32
Posts: 8,498
iTrader: 0 / 0%
Ride: 2002 WRB Impreza WRX
Rep Power: 99
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
This space left intentionally blank. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
2003 Infiniti G35 1992 Civic Si Hatch JDM B18C, with a B16 head, and B16 Tranny on P30 ECU Civic Type R Cams on stock valve train, uprgade to Skunk2 IM soon... AEM SRI, Greddy 4-2-1 header, 5-Zigen Fireball Catback H&R Race Drop, KYB AGX 4 way adjustable Shocks 00 GSR Wheels in Goodyear GS-D F1s Skunk2 Upper Control Arms EBP paint 1996 Civic CX Hatch - R.I.P Dec. 26, 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Granted they both run on a turbine, but the Weight to power ratio...goes to the Jets.... and less moving parts to worry about. Economically speaking..turboprop engines consume less, but need to work harder...but it is up to the designer on how he feels the aircraft should be propelled....me, I prefer jets, simple little engines...turbo props have way to many parts to inspect and maintain. Cost wize..the jets are more exspencive. [/b][/quote] Turbo props are also, generally, slower and operate at full throttle all the time. actual difference in airspeed is changed by a gearbox that actually changes the angle of the blades, making them more or less aggressive. Working in an enviornment where I'm around both, I've also noticed that Turboprops seem to need more day to day type maintenance. EDIT: Ewww, that thing makes the new SI look kewl. I can see what you mean about it looking like a turboprop setup, but I don't even think the aerospace equivilant of a brown bag would save this one from being one goofy looking plane. I'll Take the F22 with its Vectored exhaust, internal weapons bay, and supersonic without afterburners anyday :-). Oh, and did I menton it's the size of a seagull on radar! "The federal government sees to it that I know more then you..." :P __________________
Did I just say something interesting or funny? Check out my blog for more... http://campassmore.wordpress.com/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Running on two cylinders
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southbridge, MA
Age: 25
Posts: 18,155
iTrader: 1 / 100%
Ride: 2000 Mitsubishi Lancer RPW E5 Coupe
Rep Power: 337
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
nice video.
__________________
Home of the RPW built 2000 Lancer CC Coupe. See what is done to the little Evo5. "If you don't like what I've done with my car, I will gladly refund all the money you put into it." |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 97 civic shell (perfect swap) | b18c1civic97 | Vehicles: For Sale/Trade/Wanted | 36 | 04-25-2004 06:42 PM |
| Honda ECU List | pissedoffsol | Reference Materials | 0 | 01-12-2004 03:01 AM |
| Gt4 Y0! | pissedoffsol | Members' Lounge | 33 | 06-18-2003 01:13 PM |