For better or worse, in our society We've placed the priority on the husbands decision. Of course that doesn't always mean that the spouse of a brain dead person has their best interest in mind, but only if it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt otherwise should their decision in the matter be voided.
Of course more than anything I have a problem with the means of ending her life, whether or not she can feel it. More than anything this is the textbook case for euthanasia, as its a much kinder alternative.
Another factor to consider is, to what end are we keeping her alive? concensus among the doctors I've read about is that there is no hope of improving her condition. Isn't it cruel to keep her alive just so her parents can look at her and feel sorry? Given the limited nature of resources, what makes her so special that she can inproportionally suck up rescources when they would obviously be better spent on people who actually have a hope of recovering. I think the utilitarian perspective is something we need to consider. What action will do the most amount of good for the most amount of people? Of the myriad of possibilities, I am sure that keeping this poor woman alive is certainly not fulfilling that question.
Of course this doesn't factor into the decision at all, but I couldn't think of anything more sad than watching my hopelessly injured daughter in a situation like that. I don't know to what capacity her brain is functioning, but to me there is almost nothing more frightening than only being able to observe from my body, and I would never wish that on anybody (which is why the end to being john malkovitch bugs the shit out of me)
Of course more than anything I have a problem with the means of ending her life, whether or not she can feel it. More than anything this is the textbook case for euthanasia, as its a much kinder alternative.
Another factor to consider is, to what end are we keeping her alive? concensus among the doctors I've read about is that there is no hope of improving her condition. Isn't it cruel to keep her alive just so her parents can look at her and feel sorry? Given the limited nature of resources, what makes her so special that she can inproportionally suck up rescources when they would obviously be better spent on people who actually have a hope of recovering. I think the utilitarian perspective is something we need to consider. What action will do the most amount of good for the most amount of people? Of the myriad of possibilities, I am sure that keeping this poor woman alive is certainly not fulfilling that question.
Of course this doesn't factor into the decision at all, but I couldn't think of anything more sad than watching my hopelessly injured daughter in a situation like that. I don't know to what capacity her brain is functioning, but to me there is almost nothing more frightening than only being able to observe from my body, and I would never wish that on anybody (which is why the end to being john malkovitch bugs the shit out of me)