another which car poll

u got 15k what do you do?

  • 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT ~12k, 3k left over for fun

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2003 Toyota Matrix XRS ~15K

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2001 Toyota Celica ~13k 2k left over for fun

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2002 Nissan SER Spec V ~12k, 3k left over for fun

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2003 Ford Focus SVT ~13k, 2k left over for fun

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2003 VW Golf GTi VR6 ~15k

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2003 Mitsu Eclipse GTS V6 ~15k

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2001 Subaru Impreza RS ~13k, 2k left over for

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    34

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

Originally posted by wanderinman@Mar 22 2005, 11:21 AM
There's your problem, your going by blue book. Blue book is traditionally 10-15% higher than the actual used values of the cars. Thats the reason Carmax LOVES to use KBB. If you want want the dealers use (you can ask them, they carry that biznitch around in their pockets), go to Nadaguides.com
[post=477006]Quoted post[/post]​

actually, working at a dealer as i do, i can tell you from experience that we use kbb, and not nada.
 
Fair enough... saw the post about the SRT-4, you can get the Turbo 1 upgrade from the dealer for like, $340 I believe (someone might know for sure) and its 30HP and some more torque. Not a bad deal.
 
I said Spec-V, B/C i had a white 03' si it was nice, but Spec-V has a 6-speed and where just a little fast with the same mods.

Just my thanking.
 
Ok, I am not sure if any of this will help, but I was bored and thought it might... its not complete because I am tired, and want to go to sleep, all these numbers are for manuals;

CAR HP/TQ CW 0-60
2003 Honda Civic 160/132 2744 7.9
2003 Hyunda Tiburon 170/181 3015 7.8 (CW of 3023 w/ 6spd)
2003 Toyota Matrix 180/130 2800 9.0 (this doesn't seem right)
2001 Toyota Celica 140/125 2500 ???
2002 Nissan Sentra 175/180 2700 7.5
2003 Acura RSX 160/141 2721 ???
2003 Ford Focus 170/145 2675 9.0
2003 VW GTI 200/195 3011 7ish
2003 Mistu Eclipse 210/205 3241 7.3
2001 Subi Impreza 165/166 2825 ???

Some of the 0-60's were a bitch to find, so some of them I never did. Just an FYI on the GTI though. The 1.8T weighs less, burns a quicker 0-60, and has a fairly inexpensive chip that will give you impressive gains.

Ok... I'm going to sleep, hope this helped some. If anyone knows the numbers I dont have, or found something different, let me know I'll fix it.

EDIT: Damn, I spent a lot of time spacing this bitch out to look clean, sorry for the clutter, but you get the idea
 
Originally posted by wanderinman@Mar 23 2005, 12:33 AM
Fair enough... saw the post about the SRT-4, you can get the Turbo 1 upgrade from the dealer for like, $340 I believe (someone might know for sure) and its 30HP and some more torque. Not a bad deal.
[post=477404]Quoted post[/post]​

i actually work at a dodge dealership, and well, there are factory upgrades from mopar for the srt-4, i just haven't looked into them. i'll ask the guy at the parts department today at work and see how much the upgrades cost, and the power output. post em up later.
 
so all the 0-60's are fairly close to each other. is the civic really that heavy? I like the neon's power but its still a neon. I dont know about dodge reliability.
 
go to nasioc.com (Biggest subaru forum online. Dwarfs honda-tech.com) they have TONS of wrx's with lower miles for 15k or so. the resale value on the WRX and STI have really not been that strong compared to the 2.5RS. Hell, i have even seen some STI's on ebay with buy now prices at around 22-24 with one years millage on them. Thats almost 10k lose in a year. Thats almost as bad as a ford.
 
Originally posted by asmallsol@Mar 24 2005, 01:20 PM
go to nasioc.com (Biggest subaru forum online. Dwarfs honda-tech.com) they have TONS of wrx's with lower miles for 15k or so. the resale value on the WRX and STI have really not been that strong compared to the 2.5RS. Hell, i have even seen some STI's on ebay with buy now prices at around 22-24 with one years millage on them. Thats almost 10k lose in a year. Thats almost as bad as a ford.
[post=478139]Quoted post[/post]​


That's Ebay, man. Prices are always lower. Typically, with a regular private or stealership sale, with one year's mileage they'll go for $24k-$26k. That's a loss of about $5-$7k, which is pretty common for ANY car after you drive it off the lot.
 
what about a prelude? I love the way they look but there are a little older since they dont make them anymore. I saw that the 0-60 is 7.4 and its still honda.
 
Originally posted by SolPWR@Mar 25 2005, 08:39 AM
what about the aftermarket for the wrx? i like the Si because it has a legend of aftermarket.
[post=478485]Quoted post[/post]​


Are you kidding? :lol: There is so much stuff out there for the RS/WRX/STi. The RS has been around for awhile, and the WRX and the STi have only been around for a few years, but the aftermarket following for those cars is huge, and only getting bigger.
 
Even moreso in Japan, which is only helping the situation here.

Honestly, I think there are way more mid to high end cars being modded over there than there are Hondas.
 
Originally posted by SolPWR@Mar 25 2005, 11:10 AM
what about a prelude? I love the way they look but there are a little older since they dont make them anymore. I saw that the 0-60 is 7.4 and its still honda.
[post=478499]Quoted post[/post]​


my next car is going to be a prelude

kickass looks, good power, decent economy

only thing about it is that it has way too little space if u will be having passengers

since u didnt have the choice i voted for VW :unsure:
 
i did see a newer prelude, like 98 on ebay for a little under six grand buy it now. It was probably a salvage title.
the wrx has a ton of aftermarket parts available for it. 'nuff said.
evidently the srt-4 neon is awesome. well...the motor is. i heard some bullshit about the rear windows arent power windows but the front ones are because production and design was rushed. I've never sat in one to check. I've also heard that with mopar parts, you can get that neon into low low 1/4 mile times.
 
Originally posted by wanderinman@Mar 22 2005, 11:21 AM
There's your problem, your going by blue book. Blue book is traditionally 10-15% higher than the actual used values of the cars. Thats the reason Carmax LOVES to use KBB. If you want want the dealers use (you can ask them, they carry that biznitch around in their pockets), go to Nadaguides.com
[post=477006]Quoted post[/post]​



Dealers blue book is NADA, but a dealer really goes by black book prices when he looks at what a car is worth.
 
Originally posted by VTEC_CBR+Mar 23 2005, 12:12 AM-->
wanderinman
@Mar 22 2005, 11:21 AM
There's your problem, your going by blue book. Blue book is traditionally 10-15% higher than the actual used values of the cars. Thats the reason Carmax LOVES to use KBB. If you want want the dealers use (you can ask them, they carry that biznitch around in their pockets), go to Nadaguides.com
[post=477006]Quoted post[/post]​

actually, working at a dealer as i do, i can tell you from experience that we use kbb, and not nada.
[post=477392]Quoted post[/post]​



NADA, Edmunds, and KBB are used at a lot of dealers.

Most dealers will show KBB prices but perfer to go by NADA/Edmunds prices that are more profitable to themselves.

When all is said and done, a dealer will turn to the black book.
 
Back
Top