bbc on 9/11 conspiracy stuff
- Thread starter Briansol
- Start date
- Replies 48
- Views 2K
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Lol, thats a load of shit. Ever hear of NAS Whidbey (Spelling)? They have training flights goin maybe 20 hours a day with a minimum of 2 planes in the air the whole time.
George777
^^ Likes Bewbies
Klyph, I know you are familiar with blowing shit up--how does this "painted on" stuff work? Is it feasible?
The problem with a report like this--even though there are some pretty decent names/institutions attached to the report--is that most people won't consider it to be legit or hold much bearing. It almost seems like people have given up on the idea of an internal plot and focused the attention on the one trillion dollars that we have spent on the war efforts in Sand Land. For every one report like this, 10 others can be submitted by reputable people/sources refuting the claims.
The problem with a report like this--even though there are some pretty decent names/institutions attached to the report--is that most people won't consider it to be legit or hold much bearing. It almost seems like people have given up on the idea of an internal plot and focused the attention on the one trillion dollars that we have spent on the war efforts in Sand Land. For every one report like this, 10 others can be submitted by reputable people/sources refuting the claims.
the more I look at this the more i realise that there are a lot of crackpot engineers. Do these people understand the relationship of potential energy and kinetic energy? You have how ever many tons of concrete and steel interlocked and supporting its mass at how many feet in the air(potential energy)? As the building collapses all of the massive amounts of potential energy becomes kinetic energy. Think of it this way, how much energy would it take to raise 10 tons 1000 ft in the air and support it there even in 100mph winds.
