Dude, why are you so incapable of seeing such a blatantly obvious point? He's saying that a 150lbs fighter has just as good a chance of knocking another 150lbs fighter out as a 250lbs fighter has of knocking another 250lbs fighter out. That's why there are classes, to keep things even. The lighter fighters just tend to be more technical.
Now watch Human Weapon and see 150lbs men do things that you won't think is possible.
My point, they do not have just as good of chance or the number of knockouts would be similar.
You're talking about chance and probability being the same, this means that over time they results would prove to be consistent.
This is not true, there are less knockouts by 150lbers, which is what I said.
Since there are less knockouts by 150lbers there much be a defining factor that separates these fighters from the heavyweights.
Caz's argument is that the defining factor is technical ability.
My argument is that the defining factor is strength and power.
I'm not speaking in absolutes, as Silver is suggesting.
Fact is, generally, there's more knockouts by heavyweights. If lightweights have just as good of chance of knock outs, why are there less knockouts? This is the real question.
Blanco, I'm sure the show is a great show, but I'm not going to believe Caz's argument because it may have been covered on a popular TV show. Thats like saying because Myth Busters dismissed a theory, they must be correct.
On a side note, I hate you all for failing to read the thread and understand the argument.