We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by reckedracing@Dec 8 2004, 01:55 PM
this is not a debate forum, nor a historical society
you always tell people to prove it, so i am challenging you to the same thing...
prove your republican retoric...
prove to me that bush does not have ties to the saudi's and the bin laden family...
prove to me that we didn't build an afgan pipeline that wasn;t allowed by the taliban, and prove to me that the oil wasn;t protected more than things like museums and schools and hospitals...
[post=428537]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by reckedracing@Dec 8 2004, 01:56 PM
everything these days is taken "out of context"... thats what PRODUCTION is all about...
[post=428539]Quoted post[/post]
He's a published historian, who speaks nationally and internationally...he knows his stuff.
Originally posted by reckedracing@Dec 8 2004, 01:57 PM
For the record, I've voted both democrat and republican.
prove it
[post=428541]Quoted post[/post]
So that justifies it?
What in the fuck.
You just stood behind it having the 100% truth and now you're saying oh well if it was taken out of context it was taken out of context.
How can you do that and even attempt to debate? Thats disgusting.
Originally posted by reckedracing@Dec 8 2004, 02:02 PM
He's a published historian, who speaks nationally and internationally...he knows his stuff.
Paul Alexander - the author of the article i linked
A former reporter for Time magazine, Paul Alexander has written for Rolling Stone, The New York Times Magazine, The Nation, New York, Village Voice, and The Guardian. He has written biographies of Senator John McCain, Sylvia Plath, JD Salinger, and James Dean. Until recently, he was the co-host of "Batchelor & Alexander," a nationally syndicated talk radio show on the ABC radio network. Alexander has also directed a documentary on Kerry's Vietnam years, entitled "Brothers in Arms."
i would have to say that i think he also "knows his stuff"
[post=428549]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by New2TheCarScene+Dec 8 2004, 11:55 AM-->Battle Pope@Dec 8 2004, 01:50 PM
Is it just me, or after reading your "inductive reasoning" I still have no clue as to your stance beyond "republican zealot"
[post=428531]Quoted post[/post]
You know what, fuck this.
Nothing I said had a god damn word to do with being a republican or democrat.
I left all political biases aside and stated how to substaniate a claim with evidence.
Bash me some more.
fucking retard. i'm tired of this. even if i get banned/warned/whatever. Read what I said. Way to draw a conclusion far too fast.
Show me where it has to do with being a "republican zealot" other than thats what you would like to think I am.
For the record, I've voted both democrat and republican. asshole
[post=428538]Quoted post[/post]
Yes, the oil was protected more than other assets because well, monetarily it was worth more.
it may have been as a result of thinking that there were the 'bad guys' in there and that we just whiped them out.
never once did i say anything about 911 being 100% truth... i was just challenging you to prove otherwise...
[post=428554]Quoted post[/post]
primary sources
so the oil is more important than all the iraqi civilian lives that were lost???
hmmm, i disagree
and would this be the result of the same people "thinking" that THOUGHT saddam had WMD's?
bahahahahhaha
[post=428559]Quoted post[/post]
From the sounds of that claim, it sounds as if you supported the bunk Fahrenheit 9/11. Is this incorrect? Would you like to change your mind?
Originally posted by reckedracing@Dec 8 2004, 02:09 PM
primary sources
seems to me that mr alexander talking directly to military upper ranks should classify as primary sources, would you agree?
[post=428563]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Kcihcaton@Dec 8 2004, 02:13 PM
He said he was done twice now I think, yet he's gonna post again.
[post=428570]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by reckedracing@Dec 8 2004, 02:11 PM
From the sounds of that claim, it sounds as if you supported the bunk Fahrenheit 9/11. Is this incorrect? Would you like to change your mind?
like i said, i have never seen the movie, i don;t even know for sure that it deals with oil issues...
my only purpose for this thread is to show that the bush administration is CORRUPT, and giving you a chance to show me otherwise...
all the evidence i have seen points to them being rich corrupt little fuckers...
[post=428567]Quoted post[/post]