directX 9.0C is out

[posol]

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...&DisplayLang=en

upgrade y-

 

[FFCiv]

where do i exract to

 

[Tonyd0821]

this is for developers NOT the average computer user.

if you develop software, or whatever ...

then by all means dl it.

if not, then dont.

 

[Tonyd0821]

besides, i thought you hated i.e. brian?

 

[StarBellieAngel]

it's not Intardnet Exploreher. it's DirectX... something to do with audio and shit.

a lot of games use it.

 

[Havok]

Originally posted by StarBellieAngel@Jul 28 2004, 11:26 PM
it's not Intardnet Exploreher. it's DirectX... something to do with audio and shit.

a lot of games use it.

[post=369607]Quoted post[/post]​

Direct X is used for games.

 

[posol]

direct X is a video and sounds processing library for windows machines.. nothing more.

 

[B16]

made by the devil microsoft!!
lol

 

[Havok]

Brian is a flip flopper!

He puts down IE6, then promotes DirectX!

FLIP FLOPPER!

 

[posol]

i promote shit that works- i dont care who makes it

 

[B16]

John Kerry?

 

[dohcvtec_accord]

Originally posted by B16@Jul 29 2004, 10:26 AM
John Kerry?

[post=369857]Quoted post[/post]​

That's like saying a 486 computer works better than a 386.

 

[phunky.buddha]

Originally posted by dohcvtec_accord+Jul 29 2004, 12:37 PM-->

B16

@Jul 29 2004, 10:26 AM
John Kerry?

[post=369857]Quoted post[/post]​

That's like saying a 486 computer works better than a 386.

[post=369868]Quoted post[/post]​

No, the 386 > 486 because you could get that neato 387 math coprocessor and be the coolest kid on the block since you were the only one with both a CPU and an FPU running at the same time!

The 486 had that same capability, but the 386 did it first- so it was cooler.

So by Mike's superbly warped logic, the 386 > 486.

 

[phunky.buddha]

Oh... geex0r +200

 

[B16]

 

[dohcvtec_accord]

Originally posted by Calesta@Jul 29 2004, 03:02 PM
Oh... geex0r +548943894235456643543

[post=369996]Quoted post[/post]​

 

[phunky.buddha]

Originally posted by dohcvtec_accord+Jul 29 2004, 05:09 PM-->

Calesta

@Jul 29 2004, 03:02 PM
Oh... geex0r +548943894235456643543

[post=369996]Quoted post[/post]​

[post=370005]Quoted post[/post]​

Yeah, that's probably more accurate.