Quoted post[/post]]
your an idiot go try to "own" someone that hasnt been involved with hondas for 10 yrs. yeah im sure password jdm is going to say hey this intake doesnt make power but you should buy it anyway. read my post again:
"go read actual dyno tests on honda-tech then come back here. just because its cf and looks cool doesnt mean shit."
Ohhhhh....so Honda-tech.com is the bible of dynos eh? Ok then, here's some shit from your Honda-tech.com with dynos.
For the whole thread click here. The first dyno shows the AEM 3" CAI making more hp than the J's short ram intake (same intake as the PW JDM intake):
However this 2nd dyno shows the J's short ram, making
more hp than the AEM on another car:
And now a third dyno graph shows the AEM making more hp than the J's:
And that's the extent of the dynos I found on Honda-tech.com. 2 for AEM, 1 for J's (PW JDM is the same intake) Inconclusive I'd say. Especially since the first dyno was on 2 DIFFERENT CARS. What kind of comparison is that? I don't care if they both have the same type of motor in them, no 2 cars are the same. I have been following the import scene rabidly for about 4 years now, and devour every tech article I can find regarding bolt on performance parts, and have NEVER seen a dyno that shows any CAI of any brand (including AEM) make more than 7 hp on a 1.6 or 1.8L VTECH motor with headers and exhaust. Not one.
In fact as a perfect example, read the current issue of
Turbo magazine. They have a nice article in there that should inform your "I've been playing with Honda's for ten years now" ass about what a AEM intake does for a B18C1 motor with headers and exhaust. 5 to 6 horsepower. Whoopdee fricking doo.
Oh wait, here's another independent dyno test of an overpriced AEM V2 on a B16A: check out how much it sucked--
Click
"2-5 HP gain above 4000RPMs" "Loss of torque and horsepower below 4000RPMs"
And finally, to add insult to injury, the $300+ V2 is not an actual CAI? It's actually a warm-air intake? Hmm. So they charge more for an intake that doesn't even have the benefit of a cold air charge, and doesn't even gain as much power on a dyno as the regular AEM CAIs. Even the guys in that post on HT verified that in the body of one of the posts. So like I've said time and again: AEM intakes are a waste of money until someone can prove definitively otherwise. Not to mention the risk of hydrolocking your engine when you suck some rainwater into your engine. Those dynos from HT contradicted each other, especially the first one comparing two different cars. No two cars, even the same model and year, are exactly the same. If they had at least spent the time to do the short ram first, dynoed it, then installed the CAI and dynoed that one on the same car, then it would have been a legitimate comparison. Otherwise it proves nothing.
Quoted post[/post]]
maybe you should go buy a pepboys intake that claims 20 hp to go with your pep boys shift knob.
That's pretty funny, because I've never seen an intake
anywhere but AEM claiming that ridiculous number, and also never seen a dyno to back up their claim of 20whp gain on a K20A with their V2 intake. I'm not saying they're not making it up, but again, never seen proof.
And I love my new shift knob, whether you give a shit or not. I could not care less. "Interior, Exterior, Cosmetics"... Hmm. What could those words mean? Maybe posts about cosmetic or aesthetic upgrades to your car? Nooo couldn't be!