Something interesting to note (Afghanistan)

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

exactly what are you warning him for? You gotta love left wing censorship

Latest Infractions Received
Post Date Expires Points Reason Posted By
Special Investigator... 11-15-2006 12:36 PM Expired 1 Insulted Other Member(s) lsvtec
 
exactly what are you warning him for? You gotta love left wing censorship

This just in: Radical muslims ARE very into revenge, that isn't racisim, it's fact

Key word is Radical. Other muslims do not. Again, the minority speaks for the majority. It happens in all cases.

As an aside, censorship is not left wing, it is not right wing either. It's wrong is what it is. I'm on the left side of the fence and I abhor censorship. I'm sure that you, on the right side of said fence also have the same feelings towards it.
 
i have a very good idea.

why dont we take all you left wingnuts and right whoduzzits and put you in a big cage to battle it out to the death.

whoever is the victor can say whatever they wish :)
 
i have a very good idea.

why dont we take all you left wingnuts and right whoduzzits and put you in a big cage to battle it out to the death.

whoever is the victor can say whatever they wish :)

I will feast on their bodies and gain their power!!!

Why fight over it when we live in a country where we can say whatever we wish regardless?
 
because im sick of seeing this everytime i even attempt to look at a political thread.

Cry-Baby.gif
 
You can't say whatever you wish. You might say something that would make a minority unhappy. God forbid. lsvtec forbid.
 
^^^^ the eskimo kicks ass
 
So let me get this straight

LSVTEC you were the only person who used the word "arab" before you warned Cel yet you warned him for what equated to stereotyping based on race

then you claimed he uses BS news sources and the ONLY thing he had linked was to CNN news?!?

Cel Paypal me $50 and I'll drive to PTL and break his thumbs for you...
 
The addition of radical clarifies the statement, there is no problem when that is added, however that qualifier was missing form the original.

klyph you missed the point entirely. The problem isn't insulting a "minority" it is using a completely unprovable statement in an argument. The fact that it happened to be against a particular group is directed solely at those who make the prejudice comments.

If you cannot prove the statement then it is prejudice which, according to these (https://hondaswap.com/rules.php) is not allowed here on Hondaswap. How is that "liberal" censorship again?
 
So let me get this straight

LSVTEC you were the only person who used the word "arab" before you warned Cel yet you warned him for what equated to stereotyping based on race

Read the whole statement, don't just cherry pick what you like.
but even then this kind of over-generalization is still wrong
emphasis added.


Cel Paypal me $50 and I'll drive to PTL and break his thumbs for you...
Certainly constructive...
 
The addition of radical clarifies the statement, there is no problem when that is added, however that qualifier was missing form the original.

klyph you missed the point entirely. The problem isn't insulting a "minority" it is using a completely unprovable statement in an argument. The fact that it happened to be against a particular group is directed solely at those who make the prejudice comments.

If you cannot prove the statement then it is prejudice which, according to these (https://hondaswap.com/rules.php) is not allowed here on Hondaswap. How is that "liberal" censorship again?


great, then I want a commitment from you, on this thread, that from now on (becuase you've been overlooking it and that is left wing bias) you will warn anyone who says the following things

Bush Caused 9/11
the war in Iraq is about Oil
we didn't find WMD's in Iraq (I can provide a copy of a government report proving over 500 of these were infact found upon request)
the 2000 election was fixed
Bush is a racisit
Bush is protecting Bin Laden

as all of the above items cannot be proven and some of them are flat out wrong I expect the rules of Hondaswap to be enforced both ways
 
this whole thread just needs to be deleted. im sick of this political bullshit.

make your own damn forum!
 
When those statement target a single group with an unprovable, negative stereotype I will. These statements do not label any such group with any such thing. I will apply the rules equally when the situations are equal.
 
If posting something that is unproveable is against the rules, the majority of this site needs to be shut down.
Generalizations are just that, a general statement about the majority. Pertaining to the muslim thing, everyone knows when someone talks about muslims in these political debates we are referring to radical Islam. It's implied. Why would we be talking about non radicals? they are just as boring as non radical Christians.
 
great, then I want a commitment from you, on this thread, that from now on (becuase you've been overlooking it and that is left wing bias) you will warn anyone who says the following things

Bush Caused 9/11
the war in Iraq is about Oil
we didn't find WMD's in Iraq (I can provide a copy of a government report proving over 500 of these were infact found upon request)
the 2000 election was fixed
Bush is a racisit
Bush is protecting Bin Laden

as all of the above items cannot be proven and some of them are flat out wrong I expect the rules of Hondaswap to be enforced both ways

If it worked that way, we'd all be banned.

As for the WMDs, sure we did find 500 of them, I do not contest that. However what about the rest that we were told were "guaranteed to be there"? We were told that there were weapons that could endanger US soil. I do not believe that the weapons we found were of that category.

As for the others, most of those cannot be 100% proven either way. So what you're saying is that nobody should speak on them?

Like I said, we'd all be banned.
 
I think everyone is bored...and needs to go look at porn a bit to cool down.... mmmmkay....
 
If posting something that is unproveable is against the rules, the majority of this site needs to be shut down. Generalizations are just that, a general statement about the majority. Pertaining to the muslim thing, everyone knows when someone talks about muslims in these political debates we are referring to radical Islam. It's implied. Why would we be talking about non radicals? they are just as boring as non radical Christians.

And when I speak about Christians, I refer to radical and evangelical Christians (you know, the Jesus Camp ones), however not everyone sees this. Same for discussions concerning Muslims.
 
Back
Top