square Engines...

[jiahanhao]

Originally posted by LeanMeanMarine+Dec 10 2003, 11:47 AM-->

Originally posted by dohcvtec_accord@Dec 10 2003, 09:33 AM
pissedoffsol

@Dec 10 2003, 03:07 AM
im with kyle...  the rsx does nothing for me

Me Too yO'

 

[Sergey P.A.]

2001+ hatch that's what I am talking about,

they suck,

nobody likes them,

92-95 that's the reall deal,

 

[dohch22a4]

The EP hatch isn't that bad... <_<

There was a guy on here that posted his Type R conversion on his new Si and it was sick. He had the R body kit and wing and some nice rims, dropped. I think it was pretty fookin tight. But, EG hatches do own all as far as hatches go.
I actually like the EP hatch more than the EK hatch, tho.
EK's hatch is slanted waaaaaayyyyy too much.

 

[sohcslammer]

Hatches =
Coupes =

The new Si =

If you are going to rock an EG hatch, at least be original and paint it black.... oh. Wait a minute... :roll:

 

[K2e2vin]

Originally posted by Sergey P.A.@Dec 10 2003, 03:49 AM
how come every body say that K20 suck,

and I personally saw how a stock GSR hatch jest killed a Type S

many people say it sucks b/c the new variable cam timing is hard to tune and because it turns the "normal" direction it wont bolt on to popular b-series transmissions.

 

[Sergey P.A.]

man I don't know why but the thing is slow, I never drove one but.....lets say I have another friend with 95 hatch havy as hell cuz the bondo and shit, speakers, stuff like that.... with a 94 I believe GSR in it....and his GSR is not that fast eather......

even he messed up a type S so I don't know

the 200hp type S against 170 hp beaten up GSR.......

GSR had it.......so I guess the K20 wrapper is way too heavy for this shit

 

[jamesA]

Originally posted by sohcslammer@Dec 10 2003, 04:47 PM
Hatches =
Coupes =

The new Si =

If you are going to rock an EG hatch, at least be original and paint it black.... oh. Wait a minute... :roll:

hatches= lighter than coupes
coupes= heavier than hatches

the new Si= starting to grow on me (I love the stock rims) :hide:

 

[phunky.buddha]

The wheels are sweet.

The new Si also looks pretty sweet with the CTR lip set on it... makes a HUGE difference.

 

[jamesA]

yeah and the rest of the car is too... I can't believe I'm saying this. But fuck I'm also starting to like the Focus SVT 3door hatchback...


New Si= 2.0; 160 hp 132 ft lbs; with upgradability from the K20a2 5 sp, lots of cargo room. It's just becoming more appealing...yet I think the Focus has more to offer per base price & what you get.


SVT= 2.0; 170 hp 145 ft lbs; with a nice aftermarket and a 6 sp worthy, and lots of cargo room.

 

[mjfubar]

well i drove a RSX type s and i wasnt impressed the only thing that i like is the fact that it has a 6th gears that shit comes in handy on the freeway mostly when racing eclipse's on the freeway being they have a high high speed compared to a b16. but the new Si does nothing for me maybe if u put the 6 speed in it and made it not look at the focus as much.

 

[Hatchbacks Anonymous]

I owned a RSX base model. Sucked so much balls that on the 5th day of owning it, I asked the dealership to take it back because I did not want it. It was a big dealership so they took the crap back. I had to sign some papers but everything worked out ok. It was 5speed and sucked hella. Weak ass shit. When I had it I beat my friends V6 mustang, but that is not saying much.

Revolution8k, If you like the ford focus' then thats cool, I respect that, but IMO they are wack, even the focus hatchback.

 

[jamesA]

haha I beat Mustang V6s with my Escort GT. Anyway, the RSX is heavier than the Civic Si but has the same power. Thats probably why you didnt like it...and thats why I think I could only go for the Type S.

 

[K2e2vin]

i thought the si had 160hp and the rsx had 200? or is that a regular civic?

 

[dohcvtec_accord]

Base RSX has 160, Type S has 200.