The socialist regime
- Thread starter Briansol
- Start date
- Replies 35
- Views 1K
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Lot of fat guy crushing deaths in your neck of the woods? I imagine around here it's more "fat guy crushed by vending machine/twinkie display".
As far as NZ vs. AU, I do plan to travel around a little and see what's up. Not just going to go to Melbourne/Sydney and prop myself up on a bar stool for a year.
My buddy just got a job working in the marina in Perth. All his pictures are him on a boat now with his hot gf. It stings sometimes just when I message him.
lmfao, not sure why this struck me as so funny
Celerity
Well-Known Member
Incorrect. Everything you need to know about being told you can't defend yourself is said by Ted Nugent in this interview:
Ted Nugent On Gun Control - YouTube
Celerity
Well-Known Member
I'm not gonna try and make a huge Cel post here, but a lot of people have been asking me this question. Not here, but in general. See if it matches your question:
"Steve, what is the end game here ? Why would a leader not want to lead a successful, prosperous nation? Why would they want to run a shithole of depression and serfs?"
First, we need to acknowledge that question in it's routine format: "Jesus fuck, Steve. You and all of your right-wing redneck friends are all the fucking same. You think that Obama wants to destroy America, but that doesn't even make sense. You just want to kill people and lead us into anarchy."
Same question, phrased in two ways. The first is the sensible question, the second is more of the 99% of the time horseshit I hear from liberal tools. So I'm going to answer the first.
The end goal is to have you, me and all of us living in cages.
Imagine the opening scenes of 12 Monkeys for reference. Yeah, I'm going there. The goal of Communism is to make everyone equal. Which is a shitty idea. Because if you're going to be equal to the next chump, then why bother doing the equal work ? Why not just fake your way through it ? If you fake your way through it - Then you are one up on the next guy. And no one wants you to be one-up on the next guy, or they will also stop doing work. And so on, and so on.
Let me explain to you all why I say that the end game is for us to live in cages.
I'm going to combine some things that are going on today, as well as the tracks of previous attempts at communism.
Collapsing economy:
This is important. The US economy is one based on human efforts. If you want me to go into this some more, you can PM me or just watch the Ann Barnhardt video I put up before (Celerity as a woman). This means that yours, mine and all of our work is what backed up the economy. Productivity, invention, exploration, you name it. When the economy collapsed (in 1971) we abandoned all ties to actual value in currency in favor of this debt-based federal reserve note (The Fed was around WAY before 1971, but in 1971 is when the game totally changed moving forward. It was the death of the gold standard). This debt-based economy was more inline with the global accrual of wealth. You see, someone in Malta simply can't be rich because malta has nothing. So the debt-incurring process of borrowing money at interest is the only way that most of the world could trade with the rest of the world that had intrinsic value. Suddenly, we could sell a car to some schmoe in Nigeria because they could give us something that we needed in return. This served us well to catapult us into the modern world - Because now we all could take part in large televisions, GPS and MP3 players. The world became one.
The problem here, among other things, is that when the US took on this debt, we had a LOT of assets to guarantee that we would be good for it. We had resources. We have the most resources per land mass than anyone nation in the world. These resources include not only production of oil and food, but also of "open space".
Bear with me here for a sec. "Open space" has no fucking value whatsoever in the global reach. Egypt is nothing but open space. Russia is nothing but open space. The critical way to get us to borrow this money using our assets as capital was to establish value in "Open space". This is where Agenda 21 comes into play.
Agenda 21 is something you all can find out about in any corner of the internet. I'm not going to bore you with details - but I will only say that the end goal of Agenda 21 is to get all people out of open space and into cities. This will establish a control over the open space. And Control has value.
People like myself who live in rural spaces will be ushered out of that open space and "encouraged" to move into cities or spaces that are shared by other people. The size of the apartments in play are exactly what they are saying - about 200 sqft worth of space to accrue assets and living space. Garages are a thing of the past.
The end goal of Agenda 21 is to declare the open spaces as "not yours" but "ours to share" which in communist terms means "You'll need to get permission to go to the forest, that permit will certainly be denied" and "ours" means "The states". The goal is for everyone to live in cities, and have everyone climbing over each other to get work out in the fields to get some fresh air. People will be bused to work on any project in the Agenda 21 lands. Oil, natural gas, farming, and conservation efforts will be desirable jobs with low pay. A plantation. You will get money from the plantation to spend on the plantation. That's slavery.
That's a key element to grasp before moving onto the next section. I would like to go back to talk about global currency.
A lot of people are now calling upon a "resource based" currency. "This would put money in the hands of people who produced" they say. The creators of Zeitgeist seem to love this term. "Resource based economy". This is code word for communism. YOU ARE THE RESOURCE.
Sharia compliant banking (Again, refer to the Ann Barnhardt speech about religion in economy) is very in-line with Communist resource-based banking. Sharia doesn't establish an economy where common people can excel. In US dollars, if you're born into a rich family and you spend the money like an idiot, you'll be poor. In Sharia, that's not the case. If you're born into a rich family, you can't spend the wealth of the family. You are heir to a birthright. In business, many of their projects rely on slaves (A dirty little international secret.. All sharia compliant businesses employ slave labor with no worker protection whatsoever. Also,All of your chinese made products employ slave labor - The same way that I described above. They are given money to be spent "on the plantation". A slave laborer of this capacity is paid, but then charged for housing by the company, and forced to buy food provided by the company as well. People are paid just enough to pay back into the system. They can't afford even a bicycle to commute from one house to another company, and if they could - They would be fired and tossed from their homes.)
Sharia banking is a resource based economy. that's the communist model that we are being forced to eat in a few months.
Other communist experiments haven't gotten to the point of cage-living only because the people have risen against it, or it has collapsed at the competition of another nation that doesn't practice it. This time though, the whole world is in on it. There is no competition. When the US is gone - So is the world. That's the difference here.
This next global communist experiment, in place from the United Nations is the end game. We will all be subservient to an elite class (The birthright and government masters) and we will all be making money to be spent at the plantation gift shop. We will be banned from developing or taking place in our natural resources (Like hiking) because that land is already promised as collateral to the money that we have loaned. The great lakes are being drained and the water is being shipped. The farms are going out of business and taken over by the government to be used in their balance sheets, and our energy resources (even wind and shit) is NOT even being sold to us. It is all part of their balance sheet so that they can leverage more money.
And yes, there are official state department conversations about selling Alaska.
The truth is, all of this stuff is already written off. Two more things need to happen:
The American people, upon learning of the scope of this scam will rise up and kill every fucking human being that was involved in this.
The American people will live on those open spaces (Which are supposed to be the property of the UN) and will sabotage all efforts to give that land to our foreign debtors.
That is all that remains. There is no third item.
Meanwhile, in China, they have gone to the UN asking to take resources from Australia (Yes, basically to occupy Australia) because they feel that Australia needs to repay it's foreign debt with it's own hide. The UN, in turn, decided to pressure Australia to simply give it's resources to China before being able to sell on an open market. Australia complied.
When word of the great "Run on resources" came about, Agenda 21 was developed to at least put-on-paper the methods used to call in on that debt. The rest of the world is ready to collect - But the US hasn't gotten enough money from the system to hand over it's resources yet. And as a heavily armed nation, when the other foot drops and the US isn't destroyed then the US people will take up arms. So before the UN can divide up the planet to it's new UN overlords, it needs complete compliance from the United States. This can't happen without a massive dis-arming.
And the UN doesn't give a shit about a body count.
Again, in simple terms: When the news comes that the US economy is collapsed, people's attention will no longer be on pop culture. We won't care if Kanye West murdered a hundred people with his belt. All eyes will look for an answer, and the answer will come. When this answer comes the UN Government will have to maintain order, and release this new currency quickly. When the people are starving after , say, 48 hours (As Sandy and Nemo proved in the NE) they will BEG for a new currency to come into play. Guns won't even come into the picture at that point.
It's important that we reject this currency, but looking at the statistics, there is no possible way to do so. The only thing left is a complete overthrown at the mention of disarming the people, and then hope that we can hold out in a global winner-takes-all war against ... well. Everyone. I'm talking boots-on-the-ground style of warfare. EMP, Nuke, Information, Chemical and biological - everything is on the table.
As it looks right now, we'll lose this war before the first shot is fired. There are about 50% of the people in this lost country who would welcome communism even if they knew the goal was to live in a cage and be used as labor to provide for the state. Then there are the about 20% of "Ron Paul Conservatives" who think that Zeitgeist is the solution, and then the 1% of patriots who will die in battle with 3 shots fired when the police come to take their guns and win with overwhelming force.
I'm just going to find a piece of land near a river, and build underground and just keep that home in the family for as long as possible. and find a way to hide it from satellites (Farming without a permit is the type of activity that has the SWAT dropping down from helicopters) and drones (Oh.. those drones.. If you want more details on those drones, PM me) and from prying eyes who would simply take.
Good luck everyone.
"Steve, what is the end game here ? Why would a leader not want to lead a successful, prosperous nation? Why would they want to run a shithole of depression and serfs?"
First, we need to acknowledge that question in it's routine format: "Jesus fuck, Steve. You and all of your right-wing redneck friends are all the fucking same. You think that Obama wants to destroy America, but that doesn't even make sense. You just want to kill people and lead us into anarchy."
Same question, phrased in two ways. The first is the sensible question, the second is more of the 99% of the time horseshit I hear from liberal tools. So I'm going to answer the first.
The end goal is to have you, me and all of us living in cages.
Imagine the opening scenes of 12 Monkeys for reference. Yeah, I'm going there. The goal of Communism is to make everyone equal. Which is a shitty idea. Because if you're going to be equal to the next chump, then why bother doing the equal work ? Why not just fake your way through it ? If you fake your way through it - Then you are one up on the next guy. And no one wants you to be one-up on the next guy, or they will also stop doing work. And so on, and so on.
Let me explain to you all why I say that the end game is for us to live in cages.
I'm going to combine some things that are going on today, as well as the tracks of previous attempts at communism.
Collapsing economy:
This is important. The US economy is one based on human efforts. If you want me to go into this some more, you can PM me or just watch the Ann Barnhardt video I put up before (Celerity as a woman). This means that yours, mine and all of our work is what backed up the economy. Productivity, invention, exploration, you name it. When the economy collapsed (in 1971) we abandoned all ties to actual value in currency in favor of this debt-based federal reserve note (The Fed was around WAY before 1971, but in 1971 is when the game totally changed moving forward. It was the death of the gold standard). This debt-based economy was more inline with the global accrual of wealth. You see, someone in Malta simply can't be rich because malta has nothing. So the debt-incurring process of borrowing money at interest is the only way that most of the world could trade with the rest of the world that had intrinsic value. Suddenly, we could sell a car to some schmoe in Nigeria because they could give us something that we needed in return. This served us well to catapult us into the modern world - Because now we all could take part in large televisions, GPS and MP3 players. The world became one.
The problem here, among other things, is that when the US took on this debt, we had a LOT of assets to guarantee that we would be good for it. We had resources. We have the most resources per land mass than anyone nation in the world. These resources include not only production of oil and food, but also of "open space".
Bear with me here for a sec. "Open space" has no fucking value whatsoever in the global reach. Egypt is nothing but open space. Russia is nothing but open space. The critical way to get us to borrow this money using our assets as capital was to establish value in "Open space". This is where Agenda 21 comes into play.
Agenda 21 is something you all can find out about in any corner of the internet. I'm not going to bore you with details - but I will only say that the end goal of Agenda 21 is to get all people out of open space and into cities. This will establish a control over the open space. And Control has value.
People like myself who live in rural spaces will be ushered out of that open space and "encouraged" to move into cities or spaces that are shared by other people. The size of the apartments in play are exactly what they are saying - about 200 sqft worth of space to accrue assets and living space. Garages are a thing of the past.
The end goal of Agenda 21 is to declare the open spaces as "not yours" but "ours to share" which in communist terms means "You'll need to get permission to go to the forest, that permit will certainly be denied" and "ours" means "The states". The goal is for everyone to live in cities, and have everyone climbing over each other to get work out in the fields to get some fresh air. People will be bused to work on any project in the Agenda 21 lands. Oil, natural gas, farming, and conservation efforts will be desirable jobs with low pay. A plantation. You will get money from the plantation to spend on the plantation. That's slavery.
That's a key element to grasp before moving onto the next section. I would like to go back to talk about global currency.
A lot of people are now calling upon a "resource based" currency. "This would put money in the hands of people who produced" they say. The creators of Zeitgeist seem to love this term. "Resource based economy". This is code word for communism. YOU ARE THE RESOURCE.
Sharia compliant banking (Again, refer to the Ann Barnhardt speech about religion in economy) is very in-line with Communist resource-based banking. Sharia doesn't establish an economy where common people can excel. In US dollars, if you're born into a rich family and you spend the money like an idiot, you'll be poor. In Sharia, that's not the case. If you're born into a rich family, you can't spend the wealth of the family. You are heir to a birthright. In business, many of their projects rely on slaves (A dirty little international secret.. All sharia compliant businesses employ slave labor with no worker protection whatsoever. Also,All of your chinese made products employ slave labor - The same way that I described above. They are given money to be spent "on the plantation". A slave laborer of this capacity is paid, but then charged for housing by the company, and forced to buy food provided by the company as well. People are paid just enough to pay back into the system. They can't afford even a bicycle to commute from one house to another company, and if they could - They would be fired and tossed from their homes.)
Sharia banking is a resource based economy. that's the communist model that we are being forced to eat in a few months.
Other communist experiments haven't gotten to the point of cage-living only because the people have risen against it, or it has collapsed at the competition of another nation that doesn't practice it. This time though, the whole world is in on it. There is no competition. When the US is gone - So is the world. That's the difference here.
This next global communist experiment, in place from the United Nations is the end game. We will all be subservient to an elite class (The birthright and government masters) and we will all be making money to be spent at the plantation gift shop. We will be banned from developing or taking place in our natural resources (Like hiking) because that land is already promised as collateral to the money that we have loaned. The great lakes are being drained and the water is being shipped. The farms are going out of business and taken over by the government to be used in their balance sheets, and our energy resources (even wind and shit) is NOT even being sold to us. It is all part of their balance sheet so that they can leverage more money.
And yes, there are official state department conversations about selling Alaska.
The truth is, all of this stuff is already written off. Two more things need to happen:
The American people, upon learning of the scope of this scam will rise up and kill every fucking human being that was involved in this.
The American people will live on those open spaces (Which are supposed to be the property of the UN) and will sabotage all efforts to give that land to our foreign debtors.
That is all that remains. There is no third item.
Meanwhile, in China, they have gone to the UN asking to take resources from Australia (Yes, basically to occupy Australia) because they feel that Australia needs to repay it's foreign debt with it's own hide. The UN, in turn, decided to pressure Australia to simply give it's resources to China before being able to sell on an open market. Australia complied.
When word of the great "Run on resources" came about, Agenda 21 was developed to at least put-on-paper the methods used to call in on that debt. The rest of the world is ready to collect - But the US hasn't gotten enough money from the system to hand over it's resources yet. And as a heavily armed nation, when the other foot drops and the US isn't destroyed then the US people will take up arms. So before the UN can divide up the planet to it's new UN overlords, it needs complete compliance from the United States. This can't happen without a massive dis-arming.
And the UN doesn't give a shit about a body count.
Again, in simple terms: When the news comes that the US economy is collapsed, people's attention will no longer be on pop culture. We won't care if Kanye West murdered a hundred people with his belt. All eyes will look for an answer, and the answer will come. When this answer comes the UN Government will have to maintain order, and release this new currency quickly. When the people are starving after , say, 48 hours (As Sandy and Nemo proved in the NE) they will BEG for a new currency to come into play. Guns won't even come into the picture at that point.
It's important that we reject this currency, but looking at the statistics, there is no possible way to do so. The only thing left is a complete overthrown at the mention of disarming the people, and then hope that we can hold out in a global winner-takes-all war against ... well. Everyone. I'm talking boots-on-the-ground style of warfare. EMP, Nuke, Information, Chemical and biological - everything is on the table.
As it looks right now, we'll lose this war before the first shot is fired. There are about 50% of the people in this lost country who would welcome communism even if they knew the goal was to live in a cage and be used as labor to provide for the state. Then there are the about 20% of "Ron Paul Conservatives" who think that Zeitgeist is the solution, and then the 1% of patriots who will die in battle with 3 shots fired when the police come to take their guns and win with overwhelming force.
I'm just going to find a piece of land near a river, and build underground and just keep that home in the family for as long as possible. and find a way to hide it from satellites (Farming without a permit is the type of activity that has the SWAT dropping down from helicopters) and drones (Oh.. those drones.. If you want more details on those drones, PM me) and from prying eyes who would simply take.
Good luck everyone.
And I was having such a good day...
First, the intent of my post was completely missed. For instance, do you think it should be legal to shoot another person for no reason? This is the kind of law I'm saying is necessary for society. It seems a lot of you think the world should be a free-for-all.
Also, when Ike came through Texas, the majority of the people in my small town were out of power for 8 days, and no one begged for anything. Most people had been through hurricanes before, and knew how to take care of themselves. Most of the people with houses in Surfside were smart enough to have other houses further inland. A hundred thousand people commute 2+ hours a day to work in Houston and avoid living in a shoebox apartment.
I don't see Cel's doom happening in my neck of the woods. As long as too many yuppies don't figure this out.
Also, when Ike came through Texas, the majority of the people in my small town were out of power for 8 days, and no one begged for anything. Most people had been through hurricanes before, and knew how to take care of themselves. Most of the people with houses in Surfside were smart enough to have other houses further inland. A hundred thousand people commute 2+ hours a day to work in Houston and avoid living in a shoebox apartment.
I don't see Cel's doom happening in my neck of the woods. As long as too many yuppies don't figure this out.
I disagree. There will be pockets of societies/families that avoid the doom, or at least continue on with a certain quality of life.