uberdata success lsvtec 227whp 151tq!!!

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

nice- but he mentions nothing other than 91 octane and uberdata.

quite frankly, 227 out of a built ls/vtec is nothing impressive.
 
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Nov 18 2004, 08:41 AM
nice- but he mentions nothing other than 91 octane and uberdata.

quite frankly, 227 out of a built ls/vtec is nothing impressive.
[post=418650]Quoted post[/post]​


:withstupid:

Nor is a 170 hp B20 VTEC...
 
heres setup

head
b16 with head work
itr valve
supertech daul valve springs and retainers
itr lma
wicked intake manifold
wicked stage 2 camshaft
64mm throttle body
intake manifold and tb port match
skunk cam gears( set at I-2/E-2) didn t even have time to adjust!!!

block
b18a block
85mm bore/RS sleeved
wiseco pistons
crower rods

tranny
clucthmaster flywheel
4.7 fd jdm type r tranny
act hdpp w/ 6 puck
fuel
rc 370cc injectors
b&m regulator set to 38psi@idle
aem fuel rail
walbro 255lph pump
uberdata!!!

compression of motor is 12.8-1 or alittle higher maybe 13.0-1
baseline 201 whp after 1.5hrs of tuneing on a dyno jet it made 227 and 151
on 91 octane
 
Originally posted by UDT+Nov 18 2004, 03:20 AM-->
@Nov 17 2004, 11:46 PM
http://mercedimports.com/index.php?name=PN...iewtopic&t=1066
[post=418629]Quoted post[/post]​


I always like hearing good things about uberdata.
[post=418638]Quoted post[/post]​


200whp is really hard to make almotor
check this link u will see how many really make 200
http://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=681755&page=1
 
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Nov 18 2004, 08:41 AM
nice-  but he mentions nothing other than 91 octane and uberdata.

quite frankly, 227 out of a built ls/vtec is nothing impressive.
[post=418650]Quoted post[/post]​


the point was it baseline 161whp
after tuneing with uberdata it made 170whp
 
you could easily pick up 10 hp with a vafc.

I'm not dissing uberdata at all- i just don't think this is a very good example
 
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Nov 18 2004, 01:18 PM
you could easily pick up 10 hp with a vafc.

I'm not dissing uberdata at all- i just don't think this is a very good example
[post=418773]Quoted post[/post]​


Im gonna have to agree with Bitchasssol. I mean pissedoffsol :lol:

Sorry fool i just woke up and it poped in my head when i was typing.

But yeah i guess i should have said i like to hear when people have a good experience with uber or turbo edit ETC. ETC.
 
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Nov 18 2004, 03:18 PM
you could easily pick up 10 hp with a vafc.

I'm not dissing uberdata at all- i just don't think this is a very good example
[post=418773]Quoted post[/post]​


so ur saying tuneing a lsvtec with over 12.8-1 compression and makeing it
run smooth on 91 octane
is not a good example?

and that a vafc would have been better?
how r u going to control timing then?
 
Originally posted by pheonixb16aguy@Nov 18 2004, 03:50 PM
a gain of 9 or so hp after tuning is nothing .... and some cars gain more than that with a vafc ..like pissedofsol said this is not a good example ...
[post=418866]Quoted post[/post]​



the point was it baseline 161whp
after tuneing with uberdata it made 170whp


Tuning isint magic, though some times and to some people it may seem that way.

Im sure more can be gained, he didnt even mention how much time was spent on geting that 9hp not to mention theres no TQ specs or Dyno of the powerband, so there IS alot to be desired here especialy befor some one should go on proclaiming about something that was already pointed out.

Twice in one week

Captan obvious
 
Originally posted by pheonixb16aguy@Nov 18 2004, 05:50 PM
a gain of 9 or so hp after tuning is nothing .... and some cars gain more than that with a vafc ..like pissedofsol said this is not a good example ...
[post=418866]Quoted post[/post]​


i m just trying to share info
but if u guys think u know it all than good 4 u.

but a person that really spend the time and money on an almotor setup knows
how hard it is to gain 9whp
 
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Nov 18 2004, 08:41 AM
nice- but he mentions nothing other than 91 octane and uberdata.

quite frankly, 227 out of a built ls/vtec is nothing impressive.
[post=418650]Quoted post[/post]​


I do not understand why you are always shitting on other peoples cars when you never seem to be able to get any of your own projects running, let alone making 227 WHP. *shrug* I think it is pretty good considering the shitty 91 octane fuel.
 
I think it is pretty good considering the shitty 91 octane fuel.


LOL fuck you fool thats all we got out here in cali :lol:

And i like him shairing the info, but i will say this, B runs this site with as best a discresion as he can for a sole owner of it, you can only be so fair with your own proprty, though this place is more then just his any more and i think he knows that and runs this place as good a person could with all the shit that is said. Basicly thats^ why your gonna get away with that comment.

With that said i agree with you 100% :)
 
Originally posted by nfn15037+Nov 19 2004, 12:32 AM-->
pissedoffsol
@Nov 18 2004, 08:41 AM
nice-  but he mentions nothing other than 91 octane and uberdata.

quite frankly, 227 out of a built ls/vtec is nothing impressive.
[post=418650]Quoted post[/post]​


I do not understand why you are always shitting on other peoples cars when you never seem to be able to get any of your own projects running, let alone making 227 WHP. *shrug* I think it is pretty good considering the shitty 91 octane fuel.
[post=419026]Quoted post[/post]​

he wasn't shitting on anyone's car...he was just being honest
 
without charts I call BS on everything in that post REGARDLESS

but I don't care what B says...227whp on a ls/vtec is impressive
 
Originally posted by spectacle@Nov 19 2004, 04:19 AM
without charts I call BS on everything in that post REGARDLESS

but I don't care what B says...227whp on a ls/vtec is impressive
[post=419079]Quoted post[/post]​


LOL so now we have every agnle of ass hat issim, i believe him. Notice on that other forum he states an 85mm bore.
 
how would you gain more hp by tuning with an afc? uberdata owns an afc, whoever was doing the tuning, wasn't very good or could have gained a lot more power. how could tuning with an afc that only tunes fuel at a certain rpm have an advantage over a program that tunes at any given rpm at any given pressure? say you want to take away just 1% fuel at 5700 rpms, but only at 10 in/HG, how you gonna pull that one off with an afc??? say you took that fuel out, and want to take .25° of timing out at the same spot, again, how you gonna manage that with an afc??? there is no need for an afc at all if you're capable of utilizing uberdata to it's fullest potential.
 
Back
Top