1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Whats the Differance Between The VTEC & VTEC-E????

Discussion in 'General Tech and Maintenance' started by big bad black 5.9, Jun 3, 2004.

  1. big bad black 5.9

    big bad black 5.9 Junior Member

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    What parts are differant and what the same, namly from a 93' Civic VX
     
  2. UnlimitedEK9

    UnlimitedEK9 Member

    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2004
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    The VTEC-E is a fuel efficient one (it is in the Insight)...VTEC-E (Variable Valve Timing and Lift Electronic Control for Economy)

    Go To: http://www.plugitin.co.uk/insight.htm

    UnlimitedEK9
     
  3. big bad black 5.9

    big bad black 5.9 Junior Member

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    is there a big power differance between them? I have a 88' CRX Si and i want to put this engine in, will there be a loss of power or gain? i am going for economy.
     
  4. K2e2vin

    K2e2vin Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,446
    Likes Received:
    92
    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC

    yes; for example the i-vtec in the civic si is 160hp; 2.0L and utilises a vtec-e system. the rsx uses the regular vtec, and makes 200hp. for economy go for vtec-e, regular vtec for power and some economy....3-stage vtec for the best of both worlds; if you can find one (jdm and edm d15b i think)
     
  5. MikeBergy

    MikeBergy Blah blah blah....

    Messages:
    3,646
    Likes Received:
    1
    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2003
    Location:
    Central Coast, CALI
    It is probably just a cam difference, and AF map change between the two motors. Anyone have any hard evidence what exactly are the differences? I would guess that if you got Hondata, and a new camshaft, that the vtec-e motor would work just as well as the regular vtec. i-vtec is on both rsx and civic si models. The i-vtec utilises an adjustable cam timing as well as the different cam lobe profiles. The EP3 civic's vtec lobes are activated a different way, and are more mild than the rsx's k20a2, and so don't preform as well.
    Back to the vtec-e, does anyone know if the valves are the same size, does the head flow less, etc? Just trying to help this guy out.
     
  6. whiteLS

    whiteLS Senior Member

    Messages:
    126
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2002
    Location:
    Sarasota, Fl
  7. ahedau

    ahedau Senior Member

    Messages:
    647
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2002
    Location:
    Middle GA
    I took out my VTEC-E (D15z1) for a VTEC (D16Z6) Why?

    Well, the VX (VTEC-E) is good for 96hp at the flywheel vs 125 for the VTEC.

    The pistons are TINY, everything about the head is smaller, from the air intake to the throttle body, IM, exhaust... everything is for efficiency NOT power.

    What do you want out of your car? Great gas mileage? Go with VTEC-E.

    If you want some symblance (sp?) of power go with ANYTHING else.

    Not very technical but you should get the point
     
  8. Arachnid

    Arachnid Senior Member

    Messages:
    211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    if you didn't wanna visit the sights i might have a clue on vtec-e system. "when normally driving, the camlobe only pushes open one intake valve instead of 2. thus creating a swirl effect, and therefore creating good/better fuel mixture. (the head and block....i think are specifically designed to maximize this swirl effect.) when the vtec hits...the camprofiles are changed and now 2 instead of 1 intake valve is lifting. ...."now you're running on 2 valves and the intake valves overlap in degree, or, lift longer." just like regular vtec but with not so much of the lift and overlap. plus the intake and such ports on the vtec-e systems are much smaller...restricting air....

    on regular vtec...2 vavles are always running/lifting, but when vtec hits it's a way higher lift and overlap/duration...
     
  9. JDMilan

    JDMilan Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,730
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 11, 2003
    Location:
    Boca Raton, FL
  10. get_nick

    get_nick These snozzberries taste like snozzberries... VIP

    Messages:
    11,939
    Likes Received:
    1,059
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Washington State
    vtec-e sucks. you would be better off with a dx motor. unless you want 35 mpg with the vtec-e. i have a 92 vx and it is has vtec-e and is gutless. i almost can't go up hills with it. lol
     
  11. Citizen_Insane

    Citizen_Insane Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,698
    Likes Received:
    3
    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2003
    Location:
    Minneapolis
    If you want economy in an OBD 0 car, get an HF engine. 62 HP and 60trq.....and 50 mpg. Its a direct drop in besides the extra vacume stuff, which I can sell you :D. Its MPFI and everything, all you need is the motor, tranny, and ecu.
     
  12. nismogod

    nismogod Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,031
    Likes Received:
    0
    Joined:
    May 31, 2003
    Location:
    Deltona, FL
    i was told by a hondatech that the RSX-S uses a tru vtec system <3 rocker arm> where as the Vtec in the Si USDM, isn't a tru Vtec, its only a 2 rockerarm system. Where the SI gradually increases power, the RSX-S make a jump, like prior gen Vtec cars. or atleast that is how i took his explanation, i may be off a lil.
     
Verification:
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page