IE7 not too bad?
- Thread starter xj0hnx
- Start date
- Replies 29
- Views 2K
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Battle Pope
Well-Known Member
lol
and that, my friend, is why you SHOULD care about standards.
if yahoo was smart, they would make it standards based, and not give a shit which browser you are using.
IE3 will work with this site.. so will NN4.7...
but, it will be very, very plain.
its all about usable degradation.
if you want it pretty, and how it was MEANT to be, use a standards based browser.
see, think of it like this.
if you bought a k-mart brand thermometer
and then you bought a tommy hilfiger one or some shit.
you would expect that 32* is still 32* on both, right?
the world would fall to shit, and nothing would work with one another if there was not some standard to which all should apply.
all the ISO, all the IEEE, and for us, the W3.
if your inch was my foot, everything would be chaos.
opera, konquerer, mozilla, opera, safarri, and a bunch of lesser-known browsers all follow the spec.
IE follows about 60% of it.
so, i guess 60% of 1 foot is an inch?
IE
if yahoo was smart, they would make it standards based, and not give a shit which browser you are using.
IE3 will work with this site.. so will NN4.7...
but, it will be very, very plain.
its all about usable degradation.
if you want it pretty, and how it was MEANT to be, use a standards based browser.
see, think of it like this.
if you bought a k-mart brand thermometer
and then you bought a tommy hilfiger one or some shit.
you would expect that 32* is still 32* on both, right?
the world would fall to shit, and nothing would work with one another if there was not some standard to which all should apply.
all the ISO, all the IEEE, and for us, the W3.
if your inch was my foot, everything would be chaos.
opera, konquerer, mozilla, opera, safarri, and a bunch of lesser-known browsers all follow the spec.
IE follows about 60% of it.
so, i guess 60% of 1 foot is an inch?
IE
Well yea, I understand about there needing to be a standard, but it seems no one follows it completely, some more than other, but none 100%.
No matter which browser I use, on which OS, this site always looks the same. As a matter of fact, all of them do, except Yahoo...maybe they are fucked up.
No matter which browser I use, on which OS, this site always looks the same. As a matter of fact, all of them do, except Yahoo...maybe they are fucked up.
this site looks the same, because I put in hacks to trick IE into rendering properly. without them, it would not be as good.
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/intro/
http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/intro/
off the top of my head no...
most of the developers who are into standards are aware of the limitations of IE, and thus, hack Ie to work accordingly.
hell, google comes up with about 313,000 sites the deal with hacks for IE
http://www.google.com/search?hs=Jq5&hl=en&...cks&btnG=Search
most of the developers who are into standards are aware of the limitations of IE, and thus, hack Ie to work accordingly.
hell, google comes up with about 313,000 sites the deal with hacks for IE
http://www.google.com/search?hs=Jq5&hl=en&...cks&btnG=Search
yahoo, should not render correctly as is has Result:
Failed validation, 286 errors
Address: www.yahoo.com
Encoding: utf-8
Doctype: (no Doctype found)
a non-compliant site
http://www.insureone.com/insureonedotnet/index.aspx
works in IE , mozilla/firefox can't do shit with this site.
Failed validation, 286 errors
Address: www.yahoo.com
Encoding: utf-8
Doctype: (no Doctype found)
a non-compliant site
http://www.insureone.com/insureonedotnet/index.aspx
works in IE , mozilla/firefox can't do shit with this site.
Similar threads
