Massive ownage

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

mdlax1

Senior Member
Ok.. first and formost if it's too much read the cliff notes.

second: events leading up to ownage.. Doing some freelance for this guy 1-200 bucks a week decent money to put into my car.. the guy knows nothing about coding.. at all. im working on other freelance projects and dudes like drop everything and do it now.. im like.. uh.. it doesn't work that way im not a salary employee i'll get to it when i get to it. Well the dude already owes me 110 bucks for some other work.. so two days before i order a product he wants from some site he wants to use on his site.. so he ask's me to buy it for him and he'll send me the paypal money.. so i do (up until now he's been pretty good with paying me) so i install the files on his server get it running etc.. after the break down he starts bitchign that he wants the source files that i got from the site in the first place.. (their the SAME exact files, of which is on his server) and im not getting my 110 till he gets the files.. so then i tell him to promptly blow himself.. so he files a complaint with paypal saying he never got what he paid for...

The guys in the military army (i found out that his job is basically a military secretary) as well as that he's over in kuwait and he runs www.babyjai.com and there is a porn side of that site as well.. so first using his military computer for profit is a big no no and having porn.. (he also does porn) so here's the email i sent him. (WARNING MILITARY MUBBLE HALF WAY THROUGH you might wanna skip over that part (i quoted that part so you know where it starts)


Just wanted to give you an update my man....

One sent a fax to paypal for your "fraud" report.. with a screen shot of the files on your server. My credit card invoice for a payment to D man for 75 dollars the day before you sent me 75 dollars for the d man files.. their on your server I fulfilled my service. Now it wasn't too smart to mention D man in the paypal complaint cause now's there's a direct relation to my purchase and your payment to me.. you just fucked yourself. Also dave was on the phone when it all happened. .Witness.. now lets get real technical.

My girl is a navy intel officer.. she handles hmm.. uh email traffic for all the armed forces at NSA. Let me just list some of the things your in violation of. (and I have proof of almost all of them) Keep in mind while reading these.. my girlfriend is just waiting to report you to her jag office on base at the NSA. We have your name rank and your military address that you so conveniently leave as a signature on the bottom of every email :). Bottom line when you read all this stuff that to me doesn't make a bunch of sense.. from what she says.. all that money you got(s) .. 48 months in levenworth isn't worth 110 bucks + 75 bucks. In addition.. your little contract you sent me.. holds you right to using your computer for work other than military. Plus i took a few screen shots of your recent post's on the forums.. so you cant claim you didn't post any (lucky me i had a few old ones when i was admin that has your IP on it.. OUCH lets not even get into earning money while on duty on a military computer.. and all the military pictures/bios/installations.. ANY info .. i saved your last AIM message.. and my gf out ranks you.. by a lot.. lol


934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE
Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, ll conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.

Soliciting of pornography in violation of federal statute. United States v. Bilby, 39 M.J. 467 (C.M.A. 1994).

Adultery: Article 134. Note the 2002 changes to the MCM that set out criteria for charging adultery. (married and doing porn)

Communicating a thread article 137


Pornography on, distributed, viewed or relayed on government computer in violation of Articles 128 and 92 of the UCMJ.

Duty must be military task. United States v. Rust, 38 M.J. 726 (A.F.C.M.R. (the consent form you signed in order to use a military computer, yeah my g/f had to sign one too)

You'd be in violation of DOD USC 10 2252 (A)

If you not conviced keep reading:

Any person subject to this chapter who commits an act of sexual intercourse by force and without consent, is guilty of rape and shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.â€

(B) Any person subject to this chapter who, under circumstances not amounting to rape, commits an act of sexual intercourse with a person—

(1) who is not his or her spouse; and

(2) who has not attained the age of sixteen years, is guilty of carnal knowledge and shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

© Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete either of these offenses.





Sodomy (oral or
anal sex, whether heterosexual or homosexual) is a
criminal offense under Article 125 of the UCMJ.
Kissing, hugging and other forms of touching may be
charged as crimes under the “general articles,â€

Article 133 (officers) and Article 134 (enlisted or officers).
Conviction under Article 125,
133 or 134 can result in up to five years
in prison for each act, dishonorable
discharge, reduction in pay grade and
fines and forfeitures.37

SA Putnoky’s affidavit provided no description of the images found on appellant’s computer. It merely set out his conclusions that they were "child pornography," "adult pornography," and "apparent child pornography." It is well established that "[t]he magistrate’s determination ‘cannot be a mere ratification of the bare conclusions of others.’" Carter, supra, quoting Leon, supra. In United States v. Monroe, 52 MJ 326, 332 (2000), this Court reaffirmed that a magistrate may not rely on the bare bones conclusions of investigators, but instead, "must be provided sufficient information to make an independent determination under the totality of the circumstances." In Monroe, this Court held that the phrase "graphic pornographic photographs" was sufficient to describe "obscenity as legally defined." This Court cautioned, however, that "[t]his is a case of borderline sufficiency and should not be taken as a model for future conduct." Id. In my view, this Court drew the line in Monroe, and this case goes beyond that line.

:: CLIFF NOTES: ISP tracked the military guy and he got in big trouble ::

On October 22, 1996, a computer security monitor, Staff Sergeant Martin, received information from an Internet service provider that a person with a certain Internet Protocol (IP) address was "trading child pornography." Sergeant Martin traced the IP address to appellant’s government-issued, work-station computer. He then provided this information to the Office of Special Investigations (OSI).

The next day, Special Agent Schwartz of the OSI, utilizing the information provided by Sergeant Martin, obtained a search warrant to seize a "mirror image" of a hard disk from appellant’s government computer. That evening, Special Agents Schwartz and Merkel executed the warrant and made a copy of appellant’s hard drive on his government-issued computer. An analysis of this disk revealed 262 graphic images of children "in various sexual encounters, along with some text files." This search revealed that at least the text files had been viewed from or transferred to computer diskettes.

About 2 weeks later, Special Agent Schwartz interviewed Master Sergeant Schipani and asked if appellant had a computer at home. Some time later, without advising appellant of his rights, Master Sergeant Schipani asked appellant if he had a home computer, and he said he did. When the agents received this information, they contacted Mr. Putnoky, who sought the search warrant. At that time, Mr. Putnoky had been a United States Customs Service agent for 26 years. Mr. Putnoky had participated in numerous child pornography investigations. He had spent the previous 3½ years in an undercover capacity for the Customs Service, which plays a lead role in investigating child pornography that enters the United States through the mail or the Internet. "Commercially produced child pornography historically has been and continues to be a product of foreign distributors...." (From Mr. Putnoky’s affidavit, infra). Mr. Putnoky prepared an affidavit and submitted it to a federal magistrate judge, who then issued a search warrant for appellant’s residence and his personal computer


Dont push me dude RFO/Officer Orders so your basically a officer's secretary bitch.. my advice.. go send me my 110 bucks retract your fraud claim and let us move our separate ways. Let me know what you wanna do...



:cliffs: Guy in the military threatened me legally i ass rapped him by his own rules.
 
get your money, plus interest, and then turn him in :ph34r:
 
That guy was:

OWNED.jpg
 
yea and after you get your money slip some exlax into his morning coffee
 
Back
Top