i guess i should have said... he's only famous because he was 'funny' to people, and entertained them. if i knew him as a person, of course it would be different. yes, the guy who wrote the article isn't nice, but c'mon... how many other false reports of people dying have we read? maybe even some we all laughed at.
my point was, either way, alive or dead, doesn't really make a difference to me, because i don't follow his life. i don't follow anyone's but my own.