289

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

Arachnid

Senior Member
hey guys....what kinda engine is a 289. i was rollin' in my car the other day and this dude with a chevy or something(looked like an "american muscle" car!!!) was reving the shit outa his car next to me....blah blah blah what kinda engine is a 289?

don't ask me any questions on his car because i don't know shit!
 
289 cubic Inch V8... roughly a 4.8L motor I believe.

Mustang 5.0s have a 302 cubic inch V8, they're 4.968 Liters (rounded to 5.0)
the 96+ Mustang GTs use a 281 cubic inch V8, 4.6 Liters

93-97 Camaro Z28s use a 350 cubic inch V8, 5.7 Liters (more like 57xx cc)
98-02 Camaro Z28/SSs use a 346 cubich inch V8, 5.7 Liters (5665cc)
 
its an older ford motor, came in the mustang gt (i think? it was a 289 high performance) in the 60's
 
Originally posted by B16@Jun 29 2004, 05:10 PM
its an older ford motor, came in the mustang gt (i think? it was a 289 high performance) in the 60's

:werd: The mustang was debued in 1963 with a 271 HP 289 V8.
 
the Ford 289 was a compact motor made for track racing. IT's a lightweight motor, and more importantly it has incredible potential for revs and installs.

You can install a Ford 289 almost bolt-in in an older Toyota RWD. The 289 IS a substantially different motor than the Ford 4.6 current motors. The block is the same, but only in terms of rotating assembly. I've seen mildly tuned 289s in 67 2+2's at Limerock doing 9000 rpm without breaking a sweat. I've also seen them in offroading trucks idling along at incredible torque.

Some clarifications:

The 1963.5 Mustang intro had an inline 6. 1965 fully introduced the 289 V8 with low 200's hp.

The high-po 289 was found in 1967 racing, and 1968 production as a K-Code.

Cobras also came with 289s. It's rare, but more common than some other Cobras. (Typical drop-in was the 302, 351, and it's more common than a 427 SO or the 351 AC/SC)

-> Steve

I haven't run through the fact checker yet, but this is just me talking. If you are interested, I suppose I could do a write up.
 
BWAHAHAHA I WAS RIGHT

The '64½ was actually considered a '65 by Ford, but many people now use the terms to differentiate changes made by Ford after mid-August 1964
 
Back
Top