Discussion in 'NorthEast' started by Celerity, Oct 17, 2006.
I'm just curious.. all of your votes here are anonymous - Comment if you will.
Looking forward to the 19th
Well the "I'm not voting because I care" selection is there because ... quite frankly, you might want to vote but you recognise that all choices are either the same choice, or the more evil of 2 (or 3) lessers.
It's a fuckin challenge man. You know who I WANT to vote for, but you also know that my vote would be a throw-away because my candidate isn't going to win. Not even close. On the other hand, you must also recognise that I am going to try to keep that barking moonbat Lamont out of office, and the only way to guarantee that is to vote for Leiberman. But dammit, Leiberman is a Liberal just like Lamont, only he shares "most" of my view on Terror wars.
This is really tough.
Republican every time.
Because running the government is the same as running a business, and no left wing, communistic, tree humping homo-lover knows a damn thing about running a business.
There i said it
Ok, now put Ross Perot in charge of an army.
Of course, to me, the idea is just as stupid as putting a Kennedy in charge of an army. World almost ended a few times with that scenario.
liberman is a fucktard. Officially, he's an Independant.... in this running.... he can't even stick to a party.
ned is a pussy. He'll get walked all over and get nothing done.... even if his ideas were good. but, imo, they aren't.
Schlesinger actually gets pissedoff when he talks. I love it
that, and he actually has a clue i think.
I saw my first Schlesinger bumper sticker last night. I think the owner had to actually make it.
why note to vote for Lieberman
Separate names with a comma.