We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
but this happened with a kitchen knife. how are we supposed to use this incident to get knee jerk legislation if the accused used an "ok" weapon???just ban the assault knives, the big kitchen knives and hunting knives are fine.
You're right that that will be the argument. They wouldn't want to hear the fact that after the first gunshot, the school would have gone to lockdown. In this case, I think wielding a knife allowed them to go unnoticed for a longer time frame.:disgust1:
you are all completely missing the gun grabber view on this one
19 injured
12+ hospitalized
several seriously injured requiring surgery
all of them are going to live
so guns are still the problem... because if it was a gun he used instead of knives there would be more injured and several dead
knife attacks are great for the gun grabbers
because sure they cant stop attacks like this from happening
and sure people who cant readily access a gun will still find another way to cause others harm
but thanks to the absence of a gun all victims will survive this violent action
had the 12+ (or even just several of them) died instead of just being injured then they would be talking about banning high capacity military style assault kitchen knives... instead its just more fuel to the anti gun argument... "more people survive when guns arent used"
I think the epidemic we are seeing is a much more psychological issue than regulatory issue.