dood gets owned by buddies

[Capt. Orygun]

for anyone who denies evolution is real haha

 

[formby]

that was funny

 

[kaoskustoms]

wtf does it have to do with evelotion

 

[Capt. Orygun]

cause he was dumb enough to do something that dangerous

"I'm gona poor hot water on a frozen lake while I stand on it FTW!!!!111"

just like how you can sign a waiver and not wear a motorcycle helmut in Texas

Darwinism in action baybay!

 

[reckedracing]

cause he was dumb enough to do something that dangerous

"I'm gona poor hot water on a frozen lake while I stand on it FTW!!!!111"

just like how you can sign a waiver and not wear a motorcycle helmut in Texas

Darwinism in action baybay!

uhm...
have you ever been on a frozen lake?
i would say if its strong enough to hold a person then 1-2 liters of piss isn't gonna do shit
i would bet 1 whole gallon of boiling water would not be enough to get a whole through that ice

and the rope was a "just in case" kind of thing... so the only dumbness was trusting his friends who were ultimately the ones that decided to yank the rope....

if 150-200 lbs of falling person wasn't enough to go through that ice then i don't think piss could even touch it...
he prob fell into a cold puddle of his own piss

 

[BigJ]

Dude. that's all over collegehumor.com already.

Not that funny really. Guy getting pulled by his leg on a hard surface. Har Har Har.

 

[civicious]

Quoted post[/post]]just like how you can sign a waiver and not wear a motorcycle helmut in Texas

Hello, you're wrong.

STATUTE:

Title 7. Vehicles and Traffic. Subtitle G. Motorcycles and All-Terrain Vehicles. Chapter 661. Protective Headgear for Motorcycle Operators and passengers. Section 661.003. Offenses Relating to Not Wearing Protective Headgear:

2-14 HEADGEAR. (a) A person commits an offense if the person:
2-15 (1) operates or rides as a passenger on a motorcycle
2-16 on a public street or highway; and
2-17 (2) is not wearing protective headgear that meets
2-18 safety standards adopted by the department.
2-19 ( B ) A person commits an offense if the person carries on a
2-20 motorcycle on a public street or highway a passenger who is not
2-21 wearing protective headgear that meets safety standards adopted by
2-22 the department.
2-23 ( C ) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)
2-24 or ( B ) [a defense to prosecution under this section] that at the
2-25 time the offense was committed, the person required to wear
3-1 protective headgear[:]
3-2 [ (1) ] was at least 21 [18] years old[;] and had
3-3 successfully completed a motorcycle operator training and safety
3-4 course under Chapter 662 or was covered by a health insurance plan
3-5 providing the person with at least $10,000 in medical benefits for
3-6 injuries incurred as a result of an accident while operating or
3-7 riding on a motorcycle "

So, if you're 21 and have completed the MSF course, or if you've got $10k wortha medical coverage, you dont' have to wear a helmet.

 

[Seany-izzle]

peeing on a frozen lake, or pond will not make you fall through. I've peed on the lake and bays multiple times, granted thats alot smaller, look when he fell, it didnt crack at all.

His pee, not going to melt a frozen lake.

 

[civicious]

Oh yeah, that video sucked, BTW.

 

[Battle Pope]

This is the last straw, sean.

QUIT BOGARTING THE TA-TAS.

 

[reckedracing]

peeing on a frozen lake, or pond will not make you fall through. I've peed on the lake and bays multiple times, granted thats alot smaller, look when he fell, it didnt crack at all.

His pee, not going to melt a frozen lake.

god damn you man... does she have underwear on?

panites not the best thing on earth, but next to best thing on earth...

This is the last straw, sean.

QUIT BOGARTING THE TA-TAS.

its beyond intentional at this point...

 

[Seany-izzle]

cause you guys made a huge stink about it. Yes. GF. Lemme ask her. so get off my balls.

 

[Capt. Orygun]

Quoted post[/post]]

Quoted post[/post]]just like how you can sign a waiver and not wear a motorcycle helmut in Texas

Hello, you're wrong.

STATUTE:

Title 7. Vehicles and Traffic. Subtitle G. Motorcycles and All-Terrain Vehicles. Chapter 661. Protective Headgear for Motorcycle Operators and passengers. Section 661.003. Offenses Relating to Not Wearing Protective Headgear:

2-14 HEADGEAR. (a) A person commits an offense if the person:
2-15 (1) operates or rides as a passenger on a motorcycle
2-16 on a public street or highway; and
2-17 (2) is not wearing protective headgear that meets
2-18 safety standards adopted by the department.
2-19 ( B ) A person commits an offense if the person carries on a
2-20 motorcycle on a public street or highway a passenger who is not
2-21 wearing protective headgear that meets safety standards adopted by
2-22 the department.
2-23 ( C ) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (a)
2-24 or ( B ) [a defense to prosecution under this section] that at the
2-25 time the offense was committed, the person required to wear
3-1 protective headgear[:]
3-2 [ (1) ] was at least 21 [18] years old[;] and had
3-3 successfully completed a motorcycle operator training and safety
3-4 course under Chapter 662 or was covered by a health insurance plan
3-5 providing the person with at least $10,000 in medical benefits for
3-6 injuries incurred as a result of an accident while operating or
3-7 riding on a motorcycle "

So, if you're 21 and have completed the MSF course, or if you've got $10k wortha medical coverage, you dont' have to wear a helmet.

Ok I admit I'm to smart to even consider it so I don't know the facts

either way anyone who does it will hopefully wreck before they have a chance to procreate, 10K worth of medical coverage, well there's no way hopitol bills from a helmutless wreck could exceed that

 

[Celerity]

no way hospital bills could pass $10,000 for a bike accident?

HAHAHAHAHAHAH Add another 0 and you're at minimum costs for some road rash, a banged up head and a broken rib or two.

My friend hit a car at 20mph or so and wound up with $183k in bills. E is the million dollar man himself.

 

[Capt. Orygun]

my point exactly, it was sarcasim