We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
- Turbo compressor
- 1,991 cc 2 liters in-line 4 front engine with 83 mm bore, 92 mm stroke, 9.1 compression ratio, double overhead cam and four valves per cylinder
- Premium unleaded fuel
- Fuel economy EPA highway (mpg): 30 and EPA city (mpg): 24
- Multi-point injection fuel system
- 14.5 gallon main premium unleaded fuel tank
- Power: 127 kW , 170 HP SAE @ 6,000 rpm; 160 ft lb , 217 Nm @ 3,500 rpm
Originally posted by lude9593@Apr 4 2005, 01:14 AM
hmmm, i don't like those wheels. and that motor is only rated at 170hp and 160 ft/lbs? that's pretty shitty for a turbo motor. i make that much all motor. personally i think i could spend the 18k in a much more efficient way.
[post=482404]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by preluderjs@Apr 4 2005, 02:34 AM
yea, you could make much more power than that NA, but you gotta compare the power curves. And with factory turbos, its easy to turn the boost up safely and put down nice numbers if the chip is done right.
[post=482432]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by ascout91@Apr 4 2005, 01:13 AM
wait, nevermind...it's piped the turbo is just well hidden.
[post=482403]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Apr 4 2005, 08:48 AM
i've seen a few of those things at autox, and they really don't perform well at all. sooo much body roll, underpowered, and just in general, a big ass car.
not worth 18k at all IMO
[post=482482]Quoted post[/post]