We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by 92civicb18b1@Apr 14 2005, 11:58 AM
and why would you go through all the trouble of doing this swap for 10% power transfer after your front wheels already started spinning...
1.7 60's are nice.
But I wouldn't do it, even though I really want to, but I want a bunch more power at the rear...like at minimum 200 hp.
[post=487119]Quoted post[/post]
With a 10% power transfer to the rear wheels, there's no way you're going to pull 1.7 60's.
Originally posted by reckedracing@Apr 14 2005, 05:18 PM
bah, electric motors are for pussies...
[post=487185]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by K2e2vin+Apr 14 2005, 05:01 PM-->if i remember correctly, the CRV center diff, which is in the rear diff housing(or in front of it), engages by hydraulic pressure. maybe he did something with the clutch plates or hydraulics so that the rear is always engaged.
[post=487181]Quoted post[/post]
Just like Honda Tuning Magazine did it's likely he welded the spider gears in the rear diff.
Honda Tuning Magazine Aug. 2004 - On All Fours Pt. 4
...this sytem uses two oil pumps, a pressure plate, and a very F1 inspired clutch pack to engage and disengage hydraulically. One of the two oil pumps is attached to the input side of the differential. The second pump is attached to the output shaft that is spun from the rotation of the rear wheels. When the front oil pump rotates faster then the rear pump the excess oil pressure clamps the pressure plate against he clutch pack and sends engine power to the rear wheels. This system has the ability to send up to 50% of the engine power to the rear wheels.
Originally posted by unsivil_audio@Apr 15 2005, 09:05 AM
Curious....
It looks like he tapped the pressure for the vtec solenoid for his turbo.
[post=487449]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by reckedracing@Apr 14 2005, 03:58 PM
i might be a little slow but i think the right hand side says a 1.77 something 60 time... yes/no?
so does that mean that the crv puts more than 10% to the rear wheels? or that the above statement isn't quite true? or did i miss some other variable?
[post=487163]Quoted post[/post]