Is a leech a leech?

Is a leech a leech, size need not apply?

  • Yes, if even if you're spending $10 a month of your parents money vs $10K a month, it's just as bad

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, the bigger of a leech you are the worse you are, smaller leech is a lot better than a big leech.

    Votes: 2 7.1%
  • i don't give a flying fuck about this

    Votes: 6 21.4%
  • you are a retard

    Votes: 20 71.4%

  • Total voters
    28

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms

all his posts are converted by my eyes into the text equivalent of Hilary Clinton, or the aliens from mars attacks.

DAK DAK DAK DADAK
 
I answered the question myself by thinking about the problem more carefully. I still long for the '95 Civic a bit but I have a list of reasons why I think I'm going to go with the '96+ civic.

1. I saw that a car's value is 90% by it's year and not by it's generation which in turn means that you can pickup a '96 for somewhere near the price range of a '95.
2. The headlights are apparently not that good at night which would be an issue for me since I do a lot of rural driving.
3. While there was no official offset crash test ratings conducted on this car in the U.S, from what I did see, it didn't do too well which bothered me a the most.
4. Found the idea of using an OBD-I harness conversion (or making my own conversion) for use except when getting a smog check makes the idea of a '96 civic
5. Since I'm choosing a sedan so that passengers are comfortable in the back, I definitely like the extra leg room in the '96 over that of the '95.

and finally the most important part of all which totally surprised and really influenced my decision was the weight.
6. Weight: I discovered that the weight of the '96 Civic LX is 2387lbs, while the '94-'95 is 2,403 and the '92-'93 is 2,319lb. Therefore aside from not having to have a Smog Tech hookup an OBD-II scanner to the car's computer, there is no real benefit to me getting a '92-'95 Civic since weight isn't an issue.

I understand my question in my other thread was a bit over the top even when I made the thread but I was really desperate to find something that would satisfy my fear that I couldn't get the car I wanted. I really wanted to put a VX Engine into an LX Sedan and I knew that wouldn't be possible if it was a '96 model and I wanted to be smog legal. But now I realize that while the 1.6L is indeed a higher displacement motor, it makes up for it a bit by having a higher compression ratio since they didn't change the bore but increased the stroke, technically making it more efficient, so it isn't as detrimental as I once thought. So I guess my future vehicle (hopefully) will consist of a CX/VX transmission, and a D16Y5 engine.

I'm sorry I got you guys involved into my mess but it was really bothersome to me that I couldn't achieve my "dream car" (as dumb as that sounds) simply because of it doing bad in a crash test and I wanted to make the car safer so that it wouldn't fail in such a scenario especially considering that the physical chassis isn't ALL that different but obviously different enough to do badly in the test.


you suck at life...

please go drown yourself in a barrel of piss
 
What I want to know is, where the hell did the inspiration for this thread come from? Are you currently "leaching" at the moment?
 
BleachJuice.jpg
 
Its a civic. Its an econobox that's supposed to haul our poor asses around, and if we hit a pole, then that's one less person to worry about. I've honestly never reviewed the crash test ratings on any vehicle I've even bought. If I don't wanna die, I'll get a 79 lincoln, if I feel risky, or broke, I'll buy an old civic or accord. Recently I've been looking at eg hatches cause The accord is getting a little stale. Just afraid to ditch such a nice running car.


But seriously, calm the hell down.

Actually neither of those vehicles are safe, almost as if you consistently choose the "least safe" vehicles as the "most safe", hahaha. If you hit a pole in ANY vehicle at any serious speed, you're fucked, just ask the cop that slid into a pole in his Lincoln Town Car...oh wait you can't because he's dead... If you hit a pole at any significant speed, you're fucked, weight isn't going to help you there. If you hit a guardrail head on (from the edge opposed to perpendicular) you're also fucked.
 
kinda wonder how many other boards this dick bag is torturing with his retarded fucking threads
 
oh believe me... there is nothing i would rather do than hit this fucker with the ban stick


unfortunately i cant just ban fuckers for being annoying and starting dumb threads :(
 
Last edited:
The OP sent me harassing PM's that made me feel incredibly uncomfortable. Sadly the PM's where accidentally deleted and the HS logs somehow did not pick up the transmission of the message. :ph34r:
 
So basically he's a troll, please tell me thats a good enough reason to ban him? Where the hell is eg6 to lock a thread when you need him?
 
So basically he's a troll, please tell me thats a good enough reason to ban him? Where the hell is eg6 to lock a thread when you need him?

:werd:

I'm thinking he's a troll. All he does is cruise from board to board and start threads which soon get out of hand. If you read through even a few pages of that thread on Honda-Tech it's fairly obvious that he's either a troll or a clueless, arrogant, idiot...
 
So riddle me this.. If I go ape shit crazy in every one of his threads, will they be locked? Can I dodge the ban stick through an obscene loophole?


Is there some standard set of text that mods look for to lock up a thread? I'll copy/paste it after everything this kid says.
 
Back
Top