Just so you know...you can now officially build a 1969 Camaro

[SlushboxTeggy]

Quoted post[/post]]
GNXs should be behind ropes with at least 5 feet of space quaraned off from each side.

why? because its a rare muscle car made in 1987? i think their ugly and from what i just read, underpowered for a turbo car, especially one that falls under the muscle car umbrella too.

 

[hosmer]

Stats on the 87 GNX:

Hp: 276
Tq: 360
0-60: 5.5sec
1/4 mile: 13.43 @ 104mph
weight: 3545lbs
top speed: 124mph



a 70 Roadrunner with the 426 hemi (425hp) ran the 1/4 mile in 13.34@107 bone stock...the 70 hemi-Cuda did it in 13.10


Its easily in the top 20 of all-time fastest "muscle cars"

 

[SlushboxTeggy]

Quoted post[/post]]
Stats on the 87 GNX:

Hp: 276
Tq: 360
0-60: 5.5sec
1/4 mile: 13.43 @ 104mph
weight: 3545lbs
top speed: 124mph



a 70 Roadrunner with the 426 hemi (425hp) ran the 1/4 mile in 13.34@107 bone stock...the 70 hemi-Cuda did it in 13.10


Its easily in the top 20 of all-time fastest "muscle cars"

i didnt look at times, my bad. but still a muscle car, im just not a fan i guess. i would rather a turbo compact.

 

[Celerity]

Back then, that WAS a compact Regals aren't that big.

I still remember people saying that my 87 Supra was a full size car, or a "boat". Truth be told, Hondas are all sub-compacts. Easy to get used to that size.

 

[BigJ]

My mom dated a guy with a completely stock mint Hurst.

Thing had 30,000 miles and he drove it once a week for 10 minutes only. Everytime he got out of it, he'd wipe down the dash and door handles, and such. It was amazing.

Too bad it was a hurst.

 

[SlushboxTeggy]

Quoted post[/post]]
Back then, that WAS a compact Regals aren't that big.

I still remember people saying that my 87 Supra was a full size car, or a "boat". Truth be told, Hondas are all sub-compacts. Easy to get used to that size.

an import compact.