Discussion in 'Members' Lounge' started by pissedoffsol, Sep 4, 2004.
Ok.... I'd have to agree.
This can't be the stupidest thing you've ever read... I mean, You're a Libertarian for shit's sake.
whats wrong with libertarian?
i'm actually an Independant. thank you
Shiiiit. I'm just some punk form Memphis, and I've gone nearly high 12's on street rubber, no weight redux, quiet(ish) exhaust on 93 octane. If I had my way, and a pile of cash behind me, I'd have an 11 second street Honda, NO PROBELMO.
there is a guy here... southwest MO... he is working on still tuning the car.... so far he has a 12.2 on 92 and full interior and I do mean full... the only thing missing out of that car that he puts back in after the race is his school shit.... ehh... some people really are that stupid... oh... and its still an all motor car....
I thought he said you couldnt hold up making big power?
uhm rouch was using 351 which is alot bigger than 2.3 liters
and a ford 9 rear end is only as good as the parts in it. try a danna 60 or 44
The only reason he mentions the ford rear end is because ford rear ends are used in Majority of cars in NASCAR
All those articles are stupid. Read his "intelligent" engine mods what a tardcart
I think I got you beat on the stupidest thing ever read.
turbo vs supercharger
wow so a turbo pushes exhaust gasses back into the engine huh?
I thought the exhaust turned the *gasp turbine? Wow so many experts. And what about fuel management? Apparently you can't tune cars at all, so you are bound to lean out.
haha what a dumb fuck
hmmm so all these years I have had the order all messed up. For some dumb reason, I thought that you got boost at higher RPMs and turbo lag at the lower ones. I am glad I read this guys article, because now I see the light.
who said i wanted an 11 sec honda??
well i now feel like i need to go to back country missouri to get smarter after reading both those articles
Wow, some people are just SOFA KING WEE TODD DEAD. :wacko:
Remember the Alamo!!!
Separate names with a comma.