We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
palin Book ban is false,
even lib huffington post says so, here is another place saying so. now she did hypothetically ask about the process of banning books, but never listing specific titles. the fake list is like 30 titles. some weren't even out when she was in office, wtf.
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/09/08/palin_books/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/war_room
palin never pushed creationism either
Tennesseefree.com Palin Never Pushed Teaching Creationism As Governor (Lie #999 debunked)
answering a student's question and having a topic be part of the curriculum are 2 very different things.
So-called "Academic Freedom" acts blur that line.
Sorry, I've seen the cdesign proponentists (look that up) try and push their theology into the classroom too many times to believe that it won't happen again.
I can almost guarantee it will keep happening...you'd think the west would be the first people to lose religion in the class rooms, but we are clinging to it like fucking junkies. Even my fiance is pro-religion-in-schools, and she isn't the only person I know that's like that. But i do live in texas, so take that how you will.
- has no issues nor opinion on creationism vs science; believes both should be taught, compared, and contrasted, and let the student make his own choice on what to believe in.
[/list]
[/list]
Evolution is a key cornerstone of our scientific knowledge. Nothing in biology makes sense without evolutionary theory, just as nothing in chemistry makes sense without atomic theory and nothing in physics makes sense without the theory of relativity.
palin Book ban is false,
even lib huffington post says so, here is another place saying so. now she did hypothetically ask about the process of banning books, but never listing specific titles. the fake list is like 30 titles. some weren't even out when she was in office, wtf.
http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/09/08/palin_books/index.html?source=rss&aim=/politics/war_room
palin never pushed creationism either
Tennesseefree.com Palin Never Pushed Teaching Creationism As Governor (Lie #999 debunked)
smears, lies, and attacks indeed, poor obama
Nothing in biology makes sense without evolutionary theory? I believe that all life, human or otherwise, evolves. Clearly, this can not be argued.
First thing's first. Show me ANYWHERE that evolutionary theory deals with the origins of matter. That question displays a fundamental lack of understanding of exactly what evolutionary theory says. It does NOT deal with the origins of matter, that's not its job. It never was. Where all matter in the universe came from is irrelevant to evolutionary theory. All matter could have been brought into existence by a chartreuse three-legged squirrel with nuts the size of Texas who decided that he needed some friends to keep him company... and it would not alter evolutionary theory ONE BIT.But Evolution as it is taught is flawed. Even if all life and matter is derived from one mass of matter, where did that matter come from? A thing can not both exist and not exist at the same time, and therefore, can not have created itself. This can not be argued. You can not have willed yourself into existence.
This had diddly to do with evolutionary theory. If you want to know more about that, look up the Big Bang. "Matter" as we know it was created from a massive and near instant phase transition that allowed sub-atomic particles (the ones that particle accelerators, including the LHC, have shown us) under intense heat and pressure, to bond together.Either you already exist, in which case you need not will yourself to be, or you do not exist, in which case, you are capable of nothing because there is no you. Knowing this, how then did the original matter that our world is derived from, come to be?
Really? Show me why. That is a question that nobody, not even science, can answer. Answers can only be found after a time called the 'Planck Epoch', which is the nanosecond after the Big Bang. Why can't we go back farther than this? Because the numbers go beyond infinite, and no mathematical equations can be done at that point.It can not have always existed infinitely. ALL matter is contingent upon some other action.
Again, what's this got to do with evolutionary theory? What you're attempting to say is equivalent to saying that just because gravity can't answer the same question, that it must be invalid as well. That's ridiculous simply because that's not gravitation theory's job.This has been pointed out by many philosophers, religious and nonreligious. How does science explain the existence of matter. Trace it back as far as you'd like, to a single electron buzzing in a vacuum...it can not be its' own creator so where did it come from?
That is correct. Evolution is a mechanic of life.
First thing's first. Show me ANYWHERE that evolutionary theory deals with the origins of matter. That question displays a fundamental lack of understanding of exactly what evolutionary theory says. It does NOT deal with the origins of matter, that's not its job. It never was. Where all matter in the universe came from is irrelevant to evolutionary theory. All matter could have been brought into existence by a chartreuse three-legged squirrel with nuts the size of Texas who decided that he needed some friends to keep him company... and it would not alter evolutionary theory ONE BIT.
Evolution does not address the origins of matter. Evolution does not address the origins of life. What does it address? "The Origin of Species". It's the friggin title of Charlie's book. It addresses the question of the diversity of life, nothing more.
This had diddly to do with evolutionary theory. If you want to know more about that, look up the Big Bang. "Matter" as we know it was created from a massive and near instant phase transition that allowed sub-atomic particles (the ones that particle accelerators, including the LHC, have shown us) under intense heat and pressure, to bond together.
Really? Show me why. That is a question that nobody, not even science, can answer. Answers can only be found after a time called the 'Planck Epoch', which is the nanosecond after the Big Bang. Why can't we go back farther than this? Because the numbers go beyond infinite, and no mathematical equations can be done at that point.
Remember that both evolution and gravity are both theories, just because it's not a law doesn't mean it's not widely accepted...
Sorry Chaz, gravity is most assuredly law. There is no theory. There is a very sound and simple explanation for why we do not fall off the earth. Evolution though, is educated supposition, not concrete law.