The addition of radical clarifies the statement, there is no problem when that is added, however that qualifier was missing form the original.
klyph you missed the point entirely. The problem isn't insulting a "minority" it is using a completely unprovable statement in an argument. The fact that it happened to be against a particular group is directed solely at those who make the prejudice comments.
If you cannot prove the statement then it is prejudice which, according to these (
https://hondaswap.com/rules.php) is not allowed here on Hondaswap. How is that "liberal" censorship again?