We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by 92b16vx@Oct 29 2004, 08:05 AM
April 10, 2003 like the article says was when the US first entered the facility, the last known time they were there was in January after an inspection where they resealed them. A swedish group (International Atomic Energy Agency) was in charge of the security and bailed out at the start of the war, Kerry is really showing his ignorance on this one.
I am really pissed at most news companies right now. I swear some of the shit that gets put out as news is soo far off. An incident that really urks me is in the news last night about a convoy being hit by an RPG, well it wasn't an RPG it was a car bomb, the number of injured is wrong. Then they got two incidents backwards as far as locations. It pathetic and that's CNN.
[post=409007]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Sabz5150@Oct 29 2004, 07:05 PM
Okay, let's look at this from a different point of view... why weren't we told?
[post=409142]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by 92b16vx+Oct 29 2004, 02:09 PM-->Sabz5150@Oct 29 2004, 07:05 PM
Okay, let's look at this from a different point of view... why weren't we told?
[post=409142]Quoted post[/post]
Get a ticker in your house, if not than pay attention to minute details. Hundreds of things happen here everyday that some would call important, does that mean that everyone that finds it interesting hears about it? No, probably not. It was reported, though not on the minute to minute war updates because it wasn't as big of a deal as they are trying to make it into, since at the time there were much more pressing things for the news to cover.
[post=409187]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Sabz5150@Oct 29 2004, 08:53 PM
380 tons of missing explosives sounds pretty goddamn pressing to me! I don't even have to tell you what someone could do with that much kaboom.
[post=409218]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by 92b16vx+Oct 29 2004, 02:57 PM-->Sabz5150@Oct 29 2004, 08:53 PM
380 tons of missing explosives sounds pretty goddamn pressing to me! I don't even have to tell you what someone could do with that much kaboom.
[post=409218]Quoted post[/post]
I see what they do with bits and pieces of that much kaboom everyday.
[post=409224]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Sabz5150+Oct 29 2004, 09:01 PM-->Originally posted by 92b16vx@Oct 29 2004, 02:57 PM
Sabz5150@Oct 29 2004, 08:53 PM
380 tons of missing explosives sounds pretty goddamn pressing to me! I don't even have to tell you what someone could do with that much kaboom.
[post=409218]Quoted post[/post]
I see what they do with bits and pieces of that much kaboom everyday.
[post=409224]Quoted post[/post]
I know, and them having 380 tons more of it doesn't put happy thoughts in either of our minds. When they went missing is not as important as where they went. If that much explosive material has been missing for a year, I would hope that we'd have an answer by now.
[post=409226]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Blanco@Oct 30 2004, 11:04 AM
It certainly couldn't have been the people leading, could it? Nah.
Going by the estimate that it takes 6.5lbs. of explosives to make a car bomb and that there is 377 tons missing, that's about 116,000 car bombs.
"But are there any biological or chemical weapons there? No? Screw it."
[post=409639]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Blanco@Oct 30 2004, 08:04 PM
It certainly couldn't have been the people leading, could it? Nah.
Going by the estimate that it takes 6.5lbs. of explosives to make a car bomb and that there is 377 tons missing, that's about 116,000 car bombs.
"But are there any biological or chemical weapons there? No? Screw it."
[post=409639]Quoted post[/post]
Not to mention the fact that they failed to tell us about this, just like Abu Gharib.