We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Feb 9 2005, 03:50 PM
hrm... their budget is 2.4% MORE than last year... id on't think its an admin. problem this time...
[post=458655]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Feb 9 2005, 04:05 PM
its hard to say though dude-- the hubble has pretty much met its match- we've got everything it is capable of seeing pretty much.
in 5 years, i'm sure an even more powerful one will be sent up
[post=458668]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by hcivic.com@Feb 9 2005, 04:22 PM
NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe said even though the space agency is not getting as much money as envisioned by the president a year ago, a 2.4 percent budget increase is "rather remarkable" given the federal deficit and the spending cuts elsewhere in the government.
As for Hubble, O'Keefe said the National Academy of Sciences panel presented such a bleak assessment of a robotic mission to install new parts on the space telescope that it made little sense to presume success and, consequently, no money was put aside for such an endeavor.
Try reading the article in it entirety
[post=458678]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by CarAudiophile@Feb 10 2005, 02:35 PM
We never landed on the moon.. It was all a Hollywood Hoax.
[post=459209]Quoted post[/post]