Accordturbo94
Senior Member
If you guys dont like it that STFU! He probable doent care if you guys dislike it..
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by E_SolSi@Feb 12 2004, 12:43 AM
wow .... really needed 3 posts in a row for that????
Originally posted by Accordturbo94+Feb 12 2004, 12:51 AM-->E_SolSi@Feb 12 2004, 12:43 AM
wow .... really needed 3 posts in a row for that????
Yeah Ideas came to my head afterword! I could have edited but than again wasnt up for it. You kind of wasted a post than to! Fair enough?
Originally posted by Accordturbo94+Feb 12 2004, 12:51 AM-->E_SolSi@Feb 12 2004, 12:43 AM
wow .... really needed 3 posts in a row for that????
Yeah Ideas came to my head afterword! I could have edited but than again wasnt up for it. You kind of wasted a post than to! Fair enough?
Originally posted by E_SolSi+Feb 11 2004, 11:55 PM-->bigdaddyIII@Feb 11 2004, 10:53 PM
check the registration, jackass. there isnt a single 'neon' anywhere on it. you car buffs can get behind me on this one. we're goin way back... to the sixties and the seventies. some of the eighties and nineties, but not so much. for the gm folks, (not me, but i can appreciate) there's the tempest and the gto. look alike, two diff cars. also the pontiac ventura and the chevy nova. look a lot alike. now, for the ford guys. mustang, capri (for a while); the cougar and the t-bird. the mustang and the shelby cobra.bobcat, pinto;tempo,topaz;taurus,sable. diff cars. now for the mopar men. roadrunner,super bee. and the superbird and the charger 500. all these cars look alike. some are identical. but they are not the same model. you may think of the srt4 as a neon, and you have the right to be wrong all day long if you want. its worked so far. but fact is, it is not a neon. you cant buy a neon with a 2.4, even if you wanted to.
ps - the premium sport edition of the neon is the r/t
youre naming cars that are sold by different companies
sure they might be the same family
but different companies none the less
the SRT-4 is made and sold by dodge
the neon is made and sold by dodge
they both share the same chasis
the SRT-4 is a parts bin performance model based off of the body of the NEON and the engine of the turbo PT cruiser
even CarFax refers to it as a NEON SRT
who knows why dodge decided to leave off the neon name
at the end of the day i really dont give a fuck either way
i dont like the SRT-4
actually i dont like any of the cars you listed
Originally posted by Prowler@Feb 13 2004, 08:11 AM
whoever said they could build a 13 second civic for $21k. Whoopty - fuggin' - doo. And how many miles will be on that engine? on the car? How much tuning time to get it to perform right? You might as well make the same comparision if the Neon had 30-40k miles already on it. then you're looking at a $12k car. Can you buy a 4dr EX Civic for $12k? good luck, plus adding in a motor swap and/or turbocharger. $5-8k easy for install and proper tuning. and then you still have a crap suspension on the civic.
the neon is a better deal than anyone could build on a honda right now.
The 2003 Civic EX sedan retailed new for $17,770ish
The 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 sedan retailed new for $19,9900ish
2003 Civic EX used $14,895
2003 SRT-4 sedan used $16,105
Originally posted by Soichiro-Honda@Feb 13 2004, 02:54 AM
Neon SRT-4 = :ghey: Only reason there is a turbo on it (Mercedes Benz)
I sat in one, power windows in the front, manual windows in the back :ghey:
Come with all that power no BOV??? :ghey:
SRT-4 = Street Racing Technolgy 4 cylinder = :ghey:
Tired of people my age saying they want that cause it has turbo and make hissing noises = :ghey:
Neon SRT 4 dosent look bad caught my eye a couple of times, but the people who talk shit to me driving, made me hate it.
Give a civic dx 230 horse and we will see you makes it to the end of the 1/4 mile first.
Honda makes there cars cheap for a reason so some people like us can afford them, so we can make montsers out of them.
If dodge never went bankrupt there would be no SRT-4.
But then again FUCK NEONS
Originally posted by driverunknown@Feb 13 2004, 03:18 AM
Well cant a swapped civic be bought for a lot less than a srt-4??? THose guys are in denial saying that "its not a neon". If it looks like sh!+ and smells like sh!+, then it probably is. I hate ignorant people. Accept the fact that it's a damn neon. All those claiming it's not a neon remind me of ricers with nismo, ralliart stickers on their cars.
-me "what the hell did you do to your hatch?"
-ricer "I make a skyline kit for it. Only took 8 cases of Bondo!!!"
Originally posted by revolution8k@Feb 13 2004, 06:41 PM
The 2003 Civic EX sedan retailed new for $17,770ish
The 2003 Dodge Neon SRT-4 sedan retailed new for $19,9900ish
2003 Civic EX used $14,895
2003 SRT-4 sedan used $16,105
wait. what? the srt4 lost only 3800 something... the EX lost 2900. A big whopping difference of 900 dollars, how exactly are you proving your point? That's not a big difference IMO. A big differnce would be if the SRT-4 lost 4 grand over the EX.
Yet you say nothing of a used 2002 WRX sedan which you can get for sub 20,000 with 1-3 years of mileage on it, (since they were brought out in March of 01 as 02 models...) seeing as how they base at $23,995 and one option makes them well over 24k I'd say they lose their value pretty quickly as well. That's 4 grand in a year or two as well.
Of course if I was looking to get a fast car I'd definitely consider the SRT4 over the Civic EX, hell it would be a hole shot for me, I'd quickly jump on the band wagon of the EX model Civic and i could start taking Mustangs and shit right outta the box. :roll:
Are you reffering to the SRT-4 beating them and hte Civic being slow?, or the people that think, because it is a Civic they can beat anything? Either way it is irrelevent
Originally posted by revolution8k@Feb 13 2004, 09:59 PM
Are you reffering to the SRT-4 beating them and hte Civic being slow?, or the people that think, because it is a Civic they can beat anything? Either way it is irrelevent
I'm referring to the fact that the SRT4 is a different class of car than the Civic EX, so it's not comparable.