Football Picks Discussion
- Thread starter posol
- Start date
- Replies 884
- Views 43K
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Seany-izzle
Member
Chad Johnson is back yall!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bout time he and Palmer got their act together.
Winning isnt really based on your weekly averages... its who has the best record at the end.
Bout time he and Palmer got their act together.
Winning isnt really based on your weekly averages... its who has the best record at the end.
i wouldn't call him back yet....he had 2 amazing games, then he had a good game sunday. no td's though. i like him a lot, he's on my fantasy team. i think he's going to struggle against baltimore though.
Seany-izzle
Member
no doubt, baltimore's d is just... well nothing short of impressive. They had a huge game against Pitt but at the same time... Pitt kinda sucks 
I love chad johnson, primarily because he can talk shit and back it up... not like what plaxico did with the bears...
I love chad johnson, primarily because he can talk shit and back it up... not like what plaxico did with the bears...
It's based on your overall averages as B explained... I've been roughly at the 50% mark for a while, but now I'm falling down further.
Just like getting all A+'s, then one F on one test that fucks your entire grade. It's hard to come back with all these nonsense last minute upset pulloffs.
Seany-izzle
Member
Well honestly, i havent been keeping record of everyones weekly performance. In B's post he gives an example 50-50 = 50%... so you, for instance, 89-55 = 144. 89/144 = .618 is your average. You pick the right teams 61% of the time And if we were to declare a winner right now, you wouldnt be it because the person above you has a higher average. Atleast thats how i interpreted it.
Ask B. He's the one shellin out the money for it. But I havent been keeping track of everyones weekly progress because I thought it was just whoever has the best record at the end wins.. Maybe i fucked up...
Ask B. He's the one shellin out the money for it. But I havent been keeping track of everyones weekly progress because I thought it was just whoever has the best record at the end wins.. Maybe i fucked up...
TommyTheCat
Gonzo Scientist
That's what the post says, its based on the end of the season record. Its already enough work for you, so fuck it.
Well if we go by average...i'd be closer to the top. Sean knows why....
this isnt bracket racing just because you guess 4-12 every week doesnt make you the best
trappd-in-859
New Member
I really think Cincy is gonna take B-more tomorrow. The last time they played, Cincy gave up the ball two times really early, which in turn caused them to lose. IIRC the Bengals only lost by 6 and they weren't doing nearly as good as they are now.
I really believe the Bengals will get one of the Wild Card spots in the AFC for the play-offs.
I really believe the Bengals will get one of the Wild Card spots in the AFC for the play-offs.
i just thought of something. we need to amend the "rules". we have all been playing where you have to pick ALL of the games. but technically you only have to pick a the guaranteed winners. so you could go 8-0 every week and not pick any of the tough games. then you have the best average. we need to include a stipulation that you must pick all the games and not the overall average.
TommyTheCat
Gonzo Scientist
its not a 0, its a 1. Its a loss, from what i think ive seen.
smarty009
Senior Member
what i meant was its a 0 in the win column...not a 0 altogether...my fault for not clarifying that...
and nick...how would it be fair if you only got to pick whichever games you wanted...then people would pick all the easy ones...it makes for more competition when people pick all of them and have to make the tough choices between the teams in difficult games...it would be a pointless competition if you could pick whatever games you wanted to
Similar threads
