Originally posted by TrailorParkPimp@Jun 14 2004, 11:11 PM
maybe they should change it to:
One nation, under Canada, above Mexico.
:unsure:
i agree. at least then no one bickers about it.
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by TrailorParkPimp@Jun 14 2004, 11:11 PM
maybe they should change it to:
One nation, under Canada, above Mexico.
:unsure:
Originally posted by ahedau@Jun 14 2004, 08:12 PM
There is too much to respond to here.
If you're an atheist and it turns out you're right but you live a life based on Christian morals and precepts, who is going to suffer while you're alive?
But what if just maybe you're wrong and live a life of moral relativity and tolerance of everyone except the intolerant. Can you afford to be wrong for eternity?
Originally posted by TrailorParkPimp@Jun 14 2004, 10:11 PM
maybe they should change it to:
One nation, under Canada, above Mexico.
:unsure:
Originally posted by lsvtec+Jun 14 2004, 08:22 PM-->Originally posted by NotUrAverage_Si@Jun 14 2004, 04:38 PM
lsvtec@Jun 14 2004, 11:36 AM
You might want to check your facts there, the phrase "Under God" was added in 1954.
I am not sure what school you went to but we were not allowed to skip any part of the pledge where I went to elementary school.
Ok, is that or is that not still part of American history? 50 years ago is still history.
What school did you go to that forced you to say it? At my elementry you didn't have to say 1 word of it if you didn't want to.
This guy is obviously just some jackass who wants his 15 minutes in the spot light, to make such a big deal over it and use his daughter as an excuse is retarded. He needs to shut up and let his daughter speak for herself.
The point was,in case you missed it, that "under god" was not in the original pledge. So why does it need to stay there? Quite honestly I think that any contribution made by McCarthy and his cronies ought to be removed.
Hardcore atheist fanatics are every bit as bad as hardcore religious fanatics. They both are trying to force their beliefs on others.
Originally posted by NotUrAverage_Si@Jun 15 2004, 05:15 PM
Hardcore atheist fanatics are every bit as bad as hardcore religious fanatics. They both are trying to force their beliefs on others.
I completely agree with this statement.
Originally posted by 92b16vx+Jun 15 2004, 10:36 AM-->NotUrAverage_Si@Jun 15 2004, 05:15 PM
Hardcore atheist fanatics are every bit as bad as hardcore religious fanatics. They both are trying to force their beliefs on others.
I completely agree with this statement.
Never seen a atheist standing on the street corner preaching, and yelling at passerbys, calling them fornicators, or sinners.
Never seen a atheist standing on the street corner preaching, and yelling at passerbys, calling them fornicators, or sinners.
Originally posted by ahedau@Jun 15 2004, 08:19 PM
I hate arguing religion via the internet, so, I won't.
However, if you'd like to have an adult conversation without any personal attacks, I welcome your questions or comments about the existence of just and omnipotent God, the damage of organized religion, creationism, why evil exist, etc send me an e-mail and I'll shoot you my AIM nick
Originally posted by Havok+Jun 15 2004, 08:20 PM-->ahedau@Jun 15 2004, 08:19 PM
I hate arguing religion via the internet, so, I won't.
However, if you'd like to have an adult conversation without any personal attacks, I welcome your questions or comments about the existence of just and omnipotent God, the damage of organized religion, creationism, why evil exist, etc send me an e-mail and I'll shoot you my AIM nick
Huh? Is that directed to me?
etc send me an e-mail and I'll shoot you my AIM nick
Originally posted by NotUrAverage_Si@Jun 14 2004, 06:38 PM
Ok, is that or is that not still part of American history? 50 years ago is still history.
Originally posted by Frankie P.+Jun 15 2004, 06:52 PM-->
Never seen a atheist standing on the street corner preaching, and yelling at passerbys, calling them fornicators, or sinners.
I have never seen a christian do that either, I have only seen cults who "think" that they are christian.
I have, Christians, Muslims both, maybe some others, not to mention on any given Sunday morning or anyday early in the morning, TV is littered with them.
DarkHand Posted on Jun 15 2004@ 06:47 PM
No, but they go to the Supreme court to take two words out of a phrase, or to take words out of money, or remove a stone tablet from a court. THEY don't like it, so they want everyone else to not have it either. Same thing as the religious folks doing the opposite.
Originally posted by 92b16vx+Jun 16 2004, 11:26 AM-->DarkHand Posted on Jun 15 2004@ 06:47 PM
No, but they go to the Supreme court to take two words out of a phrase, or to take words out of money, or remove a stone tablet from a court. THEY don't like it, so they want everyone else to not have it either. Same thing as the religious folks doing the opposite.
Damn them for taking advantage of their rights and doing something Christians don't like, damn them. Seems to me that Christians have been taking away from people more and more and no one seems to question it except those it affects, I mean really just look at censorship in music, it's insane. If there ever was an example of the "moral majority" fucking with the peoples rights, that's it, and imagine, it's all because THEY don't like it. It's truely funny how christians can remove, rewrite, and rearrange to fit their views, but cry soooo much when someone takes a stand against something that shouldn't be in the first place.