L Loco Honkey Banned Oct 15, 2003 #4 Hoax. Fact: NO news publication would use "pecker" to refer to male genitalia.
jamesA Thank you for your business. VIP Oct 15, 2003 #5 I think it's because no newspaper editor would allow the word "pecker" to appear. Writers also usually use commas where commas are necessary. Still funny, because you know it COULD be true. haha
I think it's because no newspaper editor would allow the word "pecker" to appear. Writers also usually use commas where commas are necessary. Still funny, because you know it COULD be true. haha
H Havok Senior Member Oct 15, 2003 #8 Originally posted by Loco Honkey@Oct 15 2003, 10:27 PM Hoax. Fact: NO news publication would use "pecker" to refer to male genitalia. Click to expand... Might I add that "shagging" is frowned upon in the writer's world...Come on, I could have written that and made it appear real.
Originally posted by Loco Honkey@Oct 15 2003, 10:27 PM Hoax. Fact: NO news publication would use "pecker" to refer to male genitalia. Click to expand... Might I add that "shagging" is frowned upon in the writer's world...Come on, I could have written that and made it appear real.
D Def_Jam Senior Member VIP Oct 16, 2003 #9 i think it's BS but still funny about wouldn't doubt that someone tried it...there are alot of stupid people in the world.
i think it's BS but still funny about wouldn't doubt that someone tried it...there are alot of stupid people in the world.
T Tonyd0821 Banned Oct 18, 2003 #10 Originally posted by Afipunk21@Oct 15 2003, 10:21 PM That is either bullshit, or THE worst writer EVER. Click to expand... werd
Originally posted by Afipunk21@Oct 15 2003, 10:21 PM That is either bullshit, or THE worst writer EVER. Click to expand... werd