eh its all in the mind of the beholder about whoes best. I have always argued with the quality comparisons of vehicles. Especially when it comes to consumer reports. Really consumer reports is worthless, they tell you absolutely nothing. You get a comparison chart of whoes best....thats it.
Lets compare just Honda and Toyota, since most of you like these two brands. Now if Honda puts a bad alternator in a car, that dies at 100k, its what $50 diy, $200 dealer (guessing), Honda falls to the #2 spot. Toyota charges $1500 for more on average for their vehicles (just a scenario), rakes in the cash. Honda looses millions because of an alternator that really has no significant impact on the life of the vehicle. Is it fair everyone flocks to Toyota because consumer reports doesnt give you real life estimates on how long the car/car parts will last on average (in miles). Thats what I want to know.
I bet if they did it would be a really close race, most manufactures would be within 10k miles of each other.
Lets compare just Honda and Toyota, since most of you like these two brands. Now if Honda puts a bad alternator in a car, that dies at 100k, its what $50 diy, $200 dealer (guessing), Honda falls to the #2 spot. Toyota charges $1500 for more on average for their vehicles (just a scenario), rakes in the cash. Honda looses millions because of an alternator that really has no significant impact on the life of the vehicle. Is it fair everyone flocks to Toyota because consumer reports doesnt give you real life estimates on how long the car/car parts will last on average (in miles). Thats what I want to know.
I bet if they did it would be a really close race, most manufactures would be within 10k miles of each other.