dohcvtec_accord
WRX Sellout
I'd vote for McCain or Guiliani in a heartbeat.
I'd vote for a crippled horse before I voted for Hillary, btw.
I'd vote for a crippled horse before I voted for Hillary, btw.
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 03:41 PM
I was going to reply to this... then I realized that you're probably just ignorant. After all, it's hard to see what's really going on when your head is planted in your rectum.
[post=560612]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by phyregod+Sep 26 2005, 01:44 PM-->Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 03:41 PM
I was going to reply to this... then I realized that you're probably just ignorant. After all, it's hard to see what's really going on when your head is planted in your rectum.
[post=560612]Quoted post[/post]
I don't expect everyone to conform.. If everyone thought like me the world would fucking collapse.
[post=560616]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by dohcvtec_accord@Sep 26 2005, 04:42 PM
I'd vote for McCain or Guiliani in a heartbeat.
I'd vote for a crippled horse before I voted for Hillary, btw.
[post=560614]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 03:49 PM
That's good. Because if you follow the entire process beginning with the planes hitting the WTC, you can clearly see that invading iraq at this time for the reasons given was the worst idea anyone could have possibly had.
Just an observation. The way you construct your posts make you seem kind of ignorant. Either that or simply in denial toward any possible evil committed by a republican.
[post=560620]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by pissedoffsol+Sep 26 2005, 01:59 PM-->dohcvtec_accord@Sep 26 2005, 04:42 PM
I'd vote for McCain or Guiliani in a heartbeat.
why?
Originally posted by Celerity@Sep 26 2005, 04:07 PM
Ode to the WMD,
By Steven Earl, AKA Celerity.
Attention! You are all bitches. And, while it's not fair of me to say this, I don't expect ANY OF YOU to come back at me until you're done reading the following. The following exerpts are from real sources, with the URL in plain site. These are results of Gas Attacks and WMD news makers since 2003. Yes, 2003. Not the 1988 Iran / Iraq war. This is all recent shit.
A while back there were challenges to back up statements with URL sources. While I never wanted to invest the 2 hours time doing so, I decided I was bored enough to do it today. More will follow.
Iraq HAD and may even continue to HAVE Chemical agents, delivery systems, and "weapons of mass destruction", including designs on Nuclear weapons. Stay tuned for part 2 - Where I point out to you specifically and exactly when and where Saddam Hussein has threatened to use it's weapons on the US and it's european allies. Without further adieu: Choke on this
http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraq_wmd/Iraq_Oct_2002.htm#01
http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/iraq/chemicalali.htm
http://www.hrw.org/reports/1993/iraqanfal/
http://www.rediff.com/us/2003/mar/29iraq2.htm
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/200...0211-mopp01.htm
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20...20030306-8.html
Following through that: [url=http://www.un.org/Depts/unmov...//www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/SC7asdelivered.htm[/url]
Libyan Al Fatah missiles, sold by Libya, who published the human rights reports to UN: http://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/SC7asdelivered.htm
A word from New zealand: http://www.gendercide.org/case_anfal.html
[post=560636]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Sabz5150@Sep 26 2005, 02:16 PM
The one thing that gets me is if Saddie still had these chemical weapons, why in the world didn't he use them when we were invading? I'd think that if there was a force bearing down on you, that would be the best time to use 'em. He'd kill his own people? You have said time and time again that he's done it and wouldn't hesitate to do it again, so why didn't he use them? At that point, he had nothing to lose, right?[post=560640]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by dohcvtec_accord@Sep 26 2005, 05:07 PM
Alright, not so much with McCain...I mean, I remember thinking I liked some of what he was saying when he was running against W, but that was so long ago, that it's kinda fuzzy. I'm getting old, you know.
Guiliani...I've always thought he did a terrific job, from start to finish. The aftermath of the WTC was a high point, but his performance overall was on the good side of things. Of course he had his low points, just like every politician. The positives far outweigh the negatives, though.
BTW, the whole getting arrested for smoking - I'm totally OK with that.
[post=560635]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Celerity@Sep 26 2005, 05:07 PM
Ode to the WMD,
You are all bitches.
[post=560636]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by pissedoffsol+Sep 26 2005, 02:29 PM-->dohcvtec_accord@Sep 26 2005, 05:07 PM
Alright, not so much with McCain...I mean, I remember thinking I liked some of what he was saying when he was running against W, but that was so long ago, that it's kinda fuzzy. I'm getting old, you know.
so, like 12 or so years ago or more, he had a couple idaes that you being, what, 15, liked?
i think you should renew your opionion on him before jumping to conclusions...
Guiliani...I've always thought he did a terrific job, from start to finish. The aftermath of the WTC was a high point, but his performance overall was on the good side of things. Of course he had his low points, just like every politician. The positives far outweigh the negatives, though.
honestly, what did he do? the police and firefighters were the only ones who really did a thing... with 2 days, the feds took over all the WTC crap...
BTW, the whole getting arrested for smoking - I'm totally OK with that.
[post=560635]Quoted post[/post]
sure... to non-smokers this may seem like a good idea.
but do you NOT see it as a violation of the constitition of the united states--- "... and the persuit of happiness" ring a bell? take away a cig from a smoker, and you have taken away his happiness, i guarantee you that one
sure, the same can be said for crack, or whatever.. and i understand. not all things can be this way.. etc etc.
but, if he's willing to take away THAT, what's next? liquor? nyquil? oxycodone because it gets on the streets? or morphine??
what gives HIM the right to take away from a person's own choice to do things they wish to do?
[post=560648]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Battle Pope+Sep 26 2005, 04:14 PM-->That proves something...Look! I'm responding without reading your links! ohhhhh nooooess!!
[post=560639]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 04:14 PM
You want my support? Just tell me the damned truth.
Only a fool trusts a liar, Mr. President.
[post=560639]Quoted post[/post]
If the president came right out and bluntly told you the absolute truth, (which he may have already) You wouldn't believe him anyway.
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 04:23 PM
That one gets me, too. I can't understand why, if he routinely slaughters his own people, why he would hesitate to do it while an invading western presence was barrelling toward his capital.
[post=560644]Quoted post[/post]
Releasing WMDs in his own country would be the stupidest thing he could possibly do. That would be absofuckinglutely retarded. In other news, Saddam is a coward anyway.. He talks shit that he can't back up. We've all seen that.
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Sep 26 2005, 04:29 PM
what gives HIM the right to take away from a person's own choice to do things they wish to do?
[post=560648]Quoted post[/post]
There is a gray area there. I think HEALTH is the issue on that one. You may not do anything that takes away the happiness of another person. So, smoking in public is pissing off the non smokers.. and being banned is pissing off the smokers.. There is no fine line there other than the fact that smoking in public poses health risks to others..
pissedoffsol@Sep 26 2005, 04:31 PM
You are an idiot.
link to back it up: http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html
[post=560650]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by phyregod+Sep 26 2005, 02:45 PM-->Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 04:14 PM
Look! I'm responding without reading your links! ohhhhh nooooess!!
[post=560639]Quoted post[/post]
That proves something...
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 04:14 PM
You want my support? Just tell me the damned truth.
Only a fool trusts a liar, Mr. President.
[post=560639]Quoted post[/post]
If the president came right out and bluntly told you the absolute truth, (which he may have already) You wouldn't believe him anyway.
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 04:23 PM
That one gets me, too. I can't understand why, if he routinely slaughters his own people, why he would hesitate to do it while an invading western presence was barrelling toward his capital.
[post=560644]Quoted post[/post]
Releasing WMDs in his own country would be the stupidest thing he could possibly do. That would be absofuckinglutely retarded. In other news, Saddam is a coward anyway.. He talks shit that he can't back up. We've all seen that.
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Sep 26 2005, 04:29 PM
what gives HIM the right to take away from a person's own choice to do things they wish to do?
[post=560648]Quoted post[/post]
There is a gray area there. I think HEALTH is the issue on that one. You may not do anything that takes away the happiness of another person. So, smoking in public is pissing off the non smokers.. and being banned is pissing off the smokers.. There is no fine line there other than the fact that smoking in public poses health risks to others..
pissedoffsol@Sep 26 2005, 04:31 PM
You are an idiot.
link to back it up:Â http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/you.html
[post=560650]Quoted post[/post]
That solves exactly, precicely calculated and adjusted for inflation: nothing. Which is what this entire thread will eventually end up doing.
P.S. That link made McAffe freak the fuck out.
[post=560655]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by phyregod@Sep 26 2005, 02:45 PM
If the president came right out and bluntly told you the absolute truth, (which he may have already) You wouldn't believe him anyway.
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Sep 26 2005, 04:52 PM
the fact of the matter is, he didn't USE them because he didn't HAVE THEM.
[post=560661]Quoted post[/post]