We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Ditch it then. lol Doesn't look right.
Yep, Hondas aren't real cars anyway. They're slow piles of shit that are senseless to own.
the driveway with the other sho's is at my buddy zachs house, ive still got my 91 si hatch
And that, my friend, is why the Honda is still a better car
Not as ugly as a 76' Cobra, but yea, still on that list.God those Taurus's are so ugly. One of THE ugliest cars.
So you buy whatever your friends own. I had that suspicion.
The SHO does what it does because yamaha has built the engine with a motorcycle engine design philosophy. It's a VERY high output motor, made by people who actually care about what they're building, and designed for the owner who maintains his engines. I'm a big fan of the Toyota 4AGZE with it's Yamaha influence.
That said, It's gonna die real soon. GM Built a motor along these lines - then put it in the Buick Regal. They worked very well, but wore out like a bar of soap. The tolerances go south pretty quickly, and things snowball from there.
And that, my friend, is why the Honda is still a better car
OP would shit himself if he ever rode in a legit Honda, or any car....
Sho is a cool car but it is NOT fast.
As far as all the Hondas you've been in, so far every one you post has been a total piece of shit that makes Honda owners look bad. It's like you've jumped the fence and started modding cars.
Clean by your standards. It's not called the "dirty south" for no reason.
lol ive owned and built many swapped/turbocharged hondas, and out of the box power, the sho has GOBS bore torque and a much larger power curve than any honda ive ever owned
SHO vs L98 Corvette - YouTube
Just cause a has some shiny paint doesn't mean it's cleanly built. Stickers, shitty camber due to a more than likely hack job slam with way too big to be useful wheels... How'd it look inside or under the hood?