halcyon985
Senior Member
His post had more truth than yours I chop suey'ed up above...
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by Silverchild79@Jul 14 2003, 04:07 PM
AWOL from national guard for more then 10 days during a time of war (deserter). Funny, I'm an NCO in the Air Force and I can tell you that you CAN'T BE THE FREEKIN PRESIDENT IF YOU'VE DESERTED!!!! Holy Felony conviction batman!!! I hope to god we're not stupid enough to buy into this lot of shit. And assuming the rest of your statement was on par with this little tidbit I'd adivse you shoot yourself in the head now because that's exactly what it is. I'd asume now you would have me believe my president is a Felon? And for your information, President Bush DID awnser the question about his drug use stating "I have not used any drugs within the past seven years" which IS the legal awnser. I'm not even gona get into the rest of your statement which has holes in it large enough in it to drive an Element through. Strongest ecomony in US history? well numerically yes, however we should consider inflation. Inflation (believe it or not) makes numbers rise just a tad, not to mention that the size of the country is alot larger then it was during what was known as the "roaring 20's". The seeds of our resession were sewn well before "Jr" took office (nice nickname for our freekin president by the way), and all your "conspericy theories" do little to sway me. Please redirect wich actual information, and the weekly world news doesn't count...
Originally posted by lsvtec@Jul 14 2003, 05:46 PM
You actaully believe that those rules apply to everyone??? I believe that he was pardoned just as Mr Clinton was before he ran for the office of president.
Why would this president being a felon be any different than any of the previous?
It's funny how it doesn't matter if a Republican president used drugs more than 7 years ago, but then minute that we hear of a Democrat smoking a little pot while in college more than 20 years ago we all hit the roof. I love the double standard.
Why should we not call our president Jr. He is a person just like you and I. Just because he is in office does not mean he automatically commands respect. Enforcing the term "Mr. President" is a small step from "our Majesty" or "Your Holiness" No thanks.
Originally posted by lsvtec@Jul 14 2003, 06:02 PM
Ahh the good old love it or leave it syndrome. Does that make you a better American than I?
I will continue to call him Jr because I have no respect for him. That right is garaunteed to me by Amendment 2 to the Constitution which you and many other staunch love or leave it, support and never question, Bush worshippers seem to have forgotten.
I reserve "Sir" and "Mr." for those that I respect, and I would hardly call him Honorable.
But nowhere do you show us that Bush is not. WMD in Iraq (Liar), Enron and California Power Scandal (thief), making all documents surrounding his business dealings as well as the business dealings of his VP, his cabinet, and his family confidential so the public cannot follow his misdeeds (corrupt politician). I never said that Clinton was not any of these (he was/is all of them) but don't try and use that fact to show that Bush is not. It proces nothing. I think that you might want to re-tally those.lier, a thief, and a corrupt politician
That is why you proof read your posts kiddies.
Originally posted by Silverchild79@Jul 14 2003, 09:26 PM
The CIA approved all his statements before he said them, bad info happens.
CIA false info on IRAQ
The truth is Hussien did have a moble chemical wepons lab, which put him in material breech and thus allowed a war under UN resolutions.
Iraqi Weapons labs
I tried to find some sorce for the Enron collapse but the fact is the whole damn thing has been editorialized beyond the scope of real news, articles are littered with unuseful facts like how much Enron execs donated to the Bush campaign vs How much money the Bush family lost when Enron collapsed. The truth will show itself at the end of the investigation which seems to be being conducted with integrity (the Attorney General wasn't allowed to conduct the investigation because he also has recieved funding from Mr. Lay).
Lastly, I searched the net for a resouce on the "Bush hiding documents" info your ranting about and found nothing but consperecy theory websites siting classified documents surrounding the 911 incident. NEWS FLASH!! there have been classified documents for centuries, national security>your need to know
I am done with this, I simply refuse to argue this topic with a man who couldn't even pass the citizenship test. And after all this the only thing you had to say was that I spelt Liar wrong, oh no! Damn you win the spelling bee! This isn't about "nit picking". This is about the fact that your arguing politics with the son of a politian, military law/history with a Seargent, and your doing it without even a basic knowlege of the bill of rights!
sorry in advance for any spelling errors
both the Pentagon and U.S. weapons hunters have said the labs do not constitute arms.