2006 Honda Civic Si

[Prowler]

I love everything about it, especially the six speed.

 

[MXDesa]

Originally posted by Cashizslick+Feb 11 2005, 01:43 PM-->

Calesta

@Feb 10 2005, 02:13 PM
It is still a "concept", but it'll probably get that engine.  Honda would be stupid not to use it.

[post=459123]Quoted post[/post]​

No kidding, the stupidest thing honda did to the SI was to make the 03 SI slower than teh 99-00 (B16A reprezent y0).

[post=459604]Quoted post[/post]​

2003 SI is not slower than the 99-00 SI. By far faster. I work on both everyday and its easy to compare. And i also own an 03

 

[jamesA]

Originally posted by MXDesa+Feb 13 2005, 01:43 PM-->

Originally posted by Cashizslick@Feb 11 2005, 01:43 PM
Calesta

@Feb 10 2005, 02:13 PM
It is still a "concept", but it'll probably get that engine.  Honda would be stupid not to use it.

[post=459123]Quoted post[/post]​

No kidding, the stupidest thing honda did to the SI was to make the 03 SI slower than teh 99-00 (B16A reprezent y0).

[post=459604]Quoted post[/post]​

2003 SI is not slower than the 99-00 SI. By far faster. I work on both everyday and its easy to compare. And i also own an 03

[post=460395]Quoted post[/post]​

by far how faster? 99-00s have been known for 15.4s stock, most guys I've talked to say they can't get out of the 16s.

 

[90 accord]

Originally posted by 2000Si+Feb 14 2005, 08:22 PM-->

Originally posted by MXDesa@Feb 13 2005, 01:43 PM

Originally posted by Cashizslick@Feb 11 2005, 01:43 PM
Calesta

@Feb 10 2005, 02:13 PM
It is still a "concept", but it'll probably get that engine. Honda would be stupid not to use it.

[post=459123]Quoted post[/post]​

No kidding, the stupidest thing honda did to the SI was to make the 03 SI slower than teh 99-00 (B16A reprezent y0).

[post=459604]Quoted post[/post]​

2003 SI is not slower than the 99-00 SI. By far faster. I work on both everyday and its easy to compare. And i also own an 03

[post=460395]Quoted post[/post]​

by far how faster? 99-00s have been known for 15.4s stock, most guys I've talked to say they can't get out of the 16s.

[post=460918]Quoted post[/post]​

i dont know about 15.4's stock. thats what i ran in my civic, and i tore up numerous 99-00 SI's.. i mean, 3-4 cars, easily!

 

[jamesA]

Originally posted by 90 accord+Feb 16 2005, 03:04 AM-->

Originally posted by 2000Si@Feb 14 2005, 08:22 PM

Originally posted by MXDesa@Feb 13 2005, 01:43 PM

Originally posted by Cashizslick@Feb 11 2005, 01:43 PM
Calesta

@Feb 10 2005, 02:13 PM
It is still a "concept", but it'll probably get that engine.  Honda would be stupid not to use it.

[post=459123]Quoted post[/post]​

No kidding, the stupidest thing honda did to the SI was to make the 03 SI slower than teh 99-00 (B16A reprezent y0).

[post=459604]Quoted post[/post]​

2003 SI is not slower than the 99-00 SI. By far faster. I work on both everyday and its easy to compare. And i also own an 03

[post=460395]Quoted post[/post]​

by far how faster? 99-00s have been known for 15.4s stock, most guys I've talked to say they can't get out of the 16s.

[post=460918]Quoted post[/post]​

i dont know about 15.4's stock. thats what i ran in my civic, and i tore up numerous 99-00 SI's.. i mean, 3-4 cars, easily!

[post=461607]Quoted post[/post]​

I'm not saying that every 99-00 will run 15.4, but they've been known to hit that bone stock.

There's even an old C&D article I found from someone on H-T that says 15.4 for the 1/4.

 

[dveit]

Great lookin car though!

Hopefully it stays that way, seeming these are 'concept' pictures.

And you know how they like to change it up.

 

[Bob Vila]

Mine ran a 13.8.....................with a supercharger

 

[posol]

most places i've seen put a 15.6-15.7 for the EM and a 15.9 for the EP

 

[Battle Pope]

Yeah. The EP3 is remarkably heavy for a hatchback.

 

[B16RacerN2NR]

if it sells for less than 22k, i'd get one. anything more is just uncivilized, or me just being cheap

 

[MikeBergy]

Originally posted by Calesta@Feb 10 2005, 12:13 PM
It is still a "concept", but it'll probably get that engine.  Honda would be stupid not to use it.

[post=459123]Quoted post[/post]​

That is the only civic I've liked since the EF's, and the 4-door 92-95 civics. I'd venture to say that the sexy center up exhaust will NOT be on the car, just like it wasn't on the last civic si, even though it was on the last civic si concept. to honda for watering down its production vehicles so much from the concepts.

Edit: the first thing it reminded me of was the new accord coupe, but with way smoother lines and a MUCH improve front end. IMO the new accord coupe front ends look like ass.

 

[92dxhatch]

I LOVE THE LINES OF IT, thats the best looking civic i've also seen from 95, i'd go with a major drop and some 16X8's on that car, now that would look sweet. now they need to make it rear wheel drive.