dohcvtec_accord
WRX Sellout
Originally posted by revolution8k@May 12 2004, 03:40 PM
I'm actually considering an EVO when I have 32k to throw around,
Traitor!!!

We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by revolution8k@May 12 2004, 03:40 PM
I'm actually considering an EVO when I have 32k to throw around,
Originally posted by revolution8k@May 12 2004, 03:47 PM
haha yeah yeah, they discontinued the bugeyes and I don't want another used car. So as long as the EVO is around I'll consider it.
Originally posted by dohcvtec_accord+May 12 2004, 05:50 PM-->revolution8k@May 12 2004, 03:47 PM
haha yeah yeah, they discontinued the bugeyes and I don't want another used car. So as long as the EVO is around I'll consider it.
I actually prefer the new headlights to the bugeyes, hence my desire to get some cool Morettes as a replacement.
Originally posted by SpodaB1@May 12 2004, 04:17 PM
I think they are ugly... and over-priced. just a status symbol 90% fo the people who buy them dont buy them for their performance potential.
Originally posted by SpodaB1@May 12 2004, 06:17 PM
I think they are ugly... and over-priced. just a status symbol 90% fo the people who buy them dont buy them for their performance potential.
Originally posted by dohch22a4@May 12 2004, 10:30 PM
Yeah, but you can't say you'd seriously take a base dub over an Evo. They just don't compare. Taking a WRX base model over an Evo is stupid, cost aside.
Originally posted by TurboMirage+May 12 2004, 11:30 PM-->dohch22a4@May 12 2004, 10:30 PM
Yeah, but you can't say you'd seriously take a base dub over an Evo. They just don't compare. Taking a WRX base model over an Evo is stupid, cost aside.
id rather own a wrx. period. misubishi has officially stumbled with the 6g lancer. sorry. get a bit more up to date with the progress of the 4g63 motor and the different lancer chassis, and youll see what i mean. the evo is an eye opener, but only because its new HERE. its not so much "improved" over the older lancers, but more restyled.
Originally posted by preluderjs+May 13 2004, 05:07 AM-->Originally posted by TurboMirage@May 12 2004, 11:30 PM
dohch22a4@May 12 2004, 10:30 PM
Yeah, but you can't say you'd seriously take a base dub over an Evo. They just don't compare. Taking a WRX base model over an Evo is stupid, cost aside.
id rather own a wrx. period. misubishi has officially stumbled with the 6g lancer. sorry. get a bit more up to date with the progress of the 4g63 motor and the different lancer chassis, and youll see what i mean. the evo is an eye opener, but only because its new HERE. its not so much "improved" over the older lancers, but more restyled.
How'd they go wrong?
Originally posted by TurboMirage+May 13 2004, 08:51 AM-->Originally posted by preluderjs@May 13 2004, 05:07 AM
Originally posted by TurboMirage@May 12 2004, 11:30 PM
dohch22a4@May 12 2004, 10:30 PM
Yeah, but you can't say you'd seriously take a base dub over an Evo. They just don't compare. Taking a WRX base model over an Evo is stupid, cost aside.
id rather own a wrx. period. misubishi has officially stumbled with the 6g lancer. sorry. get a bit more up to date with the progress of the 4g63 motor and the different lancer chassis, and youll see what i mean. the evo is an eye opener, but only because its new HERE. its not so much "improved" over the older lancers, but more restyled.
How'd they go wrong?
do your homework - or better yet...
join an evolution forum.