We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by Calesta@Jul 18 2005, 10:41 PM
They've been nailing them for a while...
[post=528259]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Battle Pope@Jul 19 2005, 10:09 AM
But nukes can pollute the earth... I say we use thousand-pound bombs. Maybe bigger.
[post=528419]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by asmallsol+Jul 19 2005, 12:16 PM-->Battle Pope@Jul 19 2005, 10:09 AM
But nukes can pollute the earth... I say we use thousand-pound bombs. Maybe bigger.
[post=528419]Quoted post[/post]
The bomb that E pictured is not a nuke. Its US's biggest non nuclear bumb.
[post=528467]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by phyregod@Jul 19 2005, 07:52 PM
so why the hell don't they come up with a bomb with similar power as the nuke without the nasty side effects? You can't tell me that it isnt possible..
I just answered my own question..
Because it would be less destructive and less feared. A nuke fucks up your shit and keeps it fucked up. A regular bomb goes boom, you rebuild, and its back to life as usual. Nukes are fear tactics.
And yes, I would swim in shit for two and a half years for that much money. OMG.
[post=528552]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by phyregod@Jul 19 2005, 01:52 PM
Because it would be less destructive and less feared. A nuke fucks up your shit and keeps it fucked up. A regular bomb goes boom, you rebuild, and its back to life as usual. Nukes are fear tactics.
Originally posted by phyregod
so why the hell don't they come up with a bomb with similar power as the nuke without the nasty side effects? You can't tell me that it isnt possible..