i guess i should have said... he's only famous because he was 'funny' to people, and entertained them. if i knew him as a person, of course it would be different. yes, the guy who wrote the article isn't nice, but c'mon... how many other false reports of people dying have we read? maybe even some we all laughed at.
my point was, either way, alive or dead, doesn't really make a difference to me, because i don't follow his life. i don't follow anyone's but my own.
I'm not really sure how what you said could have been taken any other way, but I was pretty much commenting on how you were being egocentrc, which is of course your perogative.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.