We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by randerson165@Mar 9 2004, 04:22 PM
SHO's are the shizzy for daily drivers. They are way fun to drive, have plenty of power, and are 4 doors. I can't stand the bodystyle but if you can, go for the 1989 version, it had the yamaha engine and it was way better !!!
Originally posted by revolution8k@Mar 9 2004, 04:46 PM
The SHO is quicker than the SVT, and they're more plentiful. Last summer I seen an entire SHO sittin in a junkyard, engine, rims, everything. it was totalled from the rear. Parts=easy to find. cars themselves= I know of 3 for salle in the paper right now.
CSVTs are heavy and slow for the amount of power they have. The V6 isn't all it's cracked up to be, which is why Ford discontinued the car. However, it's rare and can be made pretty damn quick.
My vote still goes to a 1st generation SHO, although I'd go for a 92-95 model because thats when it looks the meanest after the 1st gen redesign.
Originally posted by 90 accord@Apr 8 2004, 07:03 PM
my boss had a 96-97ish sho, cost him $300 to have the spark plugs changed..
i've taken him, and earlier sho's as well. not very fast.
Thats a bunch of bull what have u taken an sho with not a 1st generation u havent 0-60 5.7 in a five speed stock wat u got that does that.. I havent spent anything on my sho and for 300.00 it has over 350 hp 0-60 in 4.9 secs 1/4 in high 11s we should meet go for a race....ill still burn if it was stock...
Thats a bunch of bull what have u taken an sho with not a 1st generation u havent 0-60 5.7 in a five speed stock wat u got that does that.. I havent spent anything on my sho and for 300.00 it has over 350 hp 0-60 in 4.9 secs 1/4 in high 11s we should meet go for a race....ill still burn if it was stock...