We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by dohch22a4@Feb 10 2004, 08:06 PM
If Richard Simmons ran a 13-second quarter mile, would you ride in him?
Originally posted by La_Pieuvre+Feb 11 2004, 03:14 AM-->dohch22a4@Feb 10 2004, 08:06 PM
If Richard Simmons ran a 13-second quarter mile, would you ride in him?
. . . <_< . . .
Come on, dude... be more creative. That made no sense.
Originally posted by E_SolSi@Feb 11 2004, 12:14 AM
neons have just as much potential as a civic does
neons are just as much of a "chick car" as a civic is
neons handle just as well as civics do
and the SRT-4 is a lot more impressive in stock form than any civic ever released
if you dont like them then you dont like them
all i can seriously say that sucks ass about them (and i say this about all dodge products) is they dont take a punch for shit.... they fair about as well as a beer can in an accident
Originally posted by bigdaddyIII@Feb 11 2004, 03:10 AM
i like em. an srt4 is not a neon.
Originally posted by La_Pieuvre+Feb 10 2004, 06:14 PM-->dohch22a4@Feb 10 2004, 08:06 PM
If Richard Simmons ran a 13-second quarter mile, would you ride in him?
. . . <_< . . .
Come on, dude... be more creative. That made no sense.
Originally posted by revolution8k@Feb 11 2004, 10:43 AM
Like I said before E, it shares the same body and platform...thats where the similiarities end.
Originally posted by E_SolSi+Feb 11 2004, 07:32 PM-->revolution8k@Feb 11 2004, 10:43 AM
Like I said before E, it shares the same body and platform...thats where the similiarities end.
look
the SRT-4 about as far away from a regular Neon, as the ITR is from a regular Integra
same body? check
stronger engine? check
stiffer sispension? check
sporty interior? check
weight reduction? dunno about the SRT-4 i would guess though
saying "its not a neon" is fucking stupid... it IS a neon... it just happens to be the premium sport edition of the neon
Originally posted by E_SolSi+Feb 11 2004, 07:32 PM-->revolution8k@Feb 11 2004, 10:43 AM
Like I said before E, it shares the same body and platform...thats where the similiarities end.
look
the SRT-4 about as far away from a regular Neon, as the ITR is from a regular Integra
same body? check
stronger engine? check
stiffer sispension? check
sporty interior? check
weight reduction? dunno about the SRT-4 i would guess though
saying "its not a neon" is fucking stupid... it IS a neon... it just happens to be the premium sport edition of the neon
Originally posted by bigdaddyIII@Feb 11 2004, 10:53 PM
check the registration, jackass. there isnt a single 'neon' anywhere on it. you car buffs can get behind me on this one. we're goin way back... to the sixties and the seventies. some of the eighties and nineties, but not so much. for the gm folks, (not me, but i can appreciate) there's the tempest and the gto. look alike, two diff cars. also the pontiac ventura and the chevy nova. look a lot alike. now, for the ford guys. mustang, capri (for a while); the cougar and the t-bird. the mustang and the shelby cobra.bobcat, pinto;tempo,topaz;taurus,sable. diff cars. now for the mopar men. roadrunner,super bee. and the superbird and the charger 500. all these cars look alike. some are identical. but they are not the same model. you may think of the srt4 as a neon, and you have the right to be wrong all day long if you want. its worked so far. but fact is, it is not a neon. you cant buy a neon with a 2.4, even if you wanted to.
ps - the premium sport edition of the neon is the r/t