Iran.
Why? http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/09/17/...dent/index.html
i can't wait to see what happens next.
Why? http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/09/17/...dent/index.html
i can't wait to see what happens next.
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Originally posted by pissedoffsol@Sep 18 2005, 02:55 AM
Iran.
Why? http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/09/17/...dent/index.html
i can't wait to see what happens next.
[post=556170]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Blanco@Sep 18 2005, 11:42 AM
The Bush administration was just so darned positive that Saddam had WMDs. Why are they so sure that Iran isn't just trying to develop power plants? This will probably end up the same way. We'll take the token steps, not get the answers we want, and in 6-12 months we could very well be knocking on Iran's door from Iraq.
[post=556190]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Celerity@Sep 18 2005, 07:06 PM
45 million less Muslims. My only complaint is that I can't watch.
[post=556404]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by hcivic.com@Sep 18 2005, 08:43 PM
let them go
till they have teck to reach us who cares let them wipe out the middle east
[post=556394]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by phyregod@Sep 19 2005, 05:45 AM
I agree with the black ops approach. No news, no invasions.. people just die and dissapear. No news, no nothing.. We should do more of that instead of these full on public efforts. We could off a few scientists, a few key people, a leader or two, steal whatever technology they have, and be done with it.
[post=556502]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by Blanco+Sep 19 2005, 04:35 AM-->I know that pretty much nobody else shares my views on this, so I'll just call it day now.
[post=556539]Quoted post[/post]
I agree with you there...
Originally posted by 92b16vx@Sep 19 2005, 07:36 AM
phyregod@Sep 19 2005, 05:45 AM
I agree with the black ops approach. No news, no invasions.. people just die and dissapear. No news, no nothing.. We should do more of that instead of these full on public efforts. We could off a few scientists, a few key people, a leader or two, steal whatever technology they have, and be done with it.
[post=556502]Quoted post[/post]
Hello welcome to 1983.
[post=556549]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by phyregod@Sep 18 2005, 09:45 PM
We can't save the world.. We can't invade every damned country that sneezes wrong, and we do need to draw the line somewhere.. I agree with the black ops approach. No news, no invasions.. people just die and dissapear. No news, no nothing.. We should do more of that instead of these full on public efforts. We could off a few scientists, a few key people, a leader or two, steal whatever technology they have, and be done with it.
[post=556502]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by endlesszeal@Sep 20 2005, 11:43 AM
by all means im no political person or whatsoever. i just think we should let them go ahead and be watchful. if we keep pushing everyone around, people are just going to hate us more.
i agree they dont really have a use for nuclear enegry. shit they have almost unlimited solar power and have oil to back it up. i see no reason for the to have nuclear power plants. however, we shouldnt deny them the fact unless we can prove they are building something. i mean, why arent we snooping under north korea or china?
this is going to be a tough call.
[post=557080]Quoted post[/post]