Wow..Yea but the difference is, the taliban are weak. We're strong. Countries have dominated other countries in history, and in the end, it's the most powerful that survives. I say we take the fuckin oil to lower gas prices.
We may earn a small commission from affiliate links and paid advertisements. Terms
Wow..Yea but the difference is, the taliban are weak. We're strong. Countries have dominated other countries in history, and in the end, it's the most powerful that survives. I say we take the fuckin oil to lower gas prices.
Lol that's that redneck part of me right there. But seriously if you can't get what you need for a decent price and it's in your country's best interest sometimes you gotta take it.
It's all good if poor people die, 'cause they're poor. A-hyuck. A-hyuck.
Yeah, that's what I thought. What makes it hypocritical is that you live in the Land of the Free and you're talking about taking the freedom away from others for your own gain.
Would it be great if we spit in the faces of the men who fought and died for this country? No, it wouldn't.
I like Ron Paul's politics, I really do. The only problem I see with him though, is that I think he's too "radical" to actually have any chance of getting the Republican nomination. And if he doesn't get the nomination, and then runs as an independent instead, he could end up being 2008's Ross Perot, i.e. the Republican vote will be split between Paul and the actual Republican candidate, thereby giving the Democratic candidate an advantage.
Not saying any of that will happen, but it could. Like I said though, I am a fan of his politics. I wish he actually had a better shot at becoming President.
This is actually the most disturbing part of this thread. His "lightning round" segment is the worst performing(money-wise), least thought out (Cramer has said it's the weakest block of his show), and yet the most popular. Go read his book B, then come back and tell me he has worth.
Shit, both him and Beck are retards.
he thinks same sex should be a state-by-state thing, not mandated by federal gov't.i read through the ron paul site.
and it seems pretty up to par on what i would like to see from the government.
i just dont meet with his views on abortion.
and he doesnt say anything about same sex marraige.
but he seems to be more interested in what is good for the country, and just the country.
Yea but the difference is, the taliban are weak. We're strong. Countries have dominated other countries in history, and in the end, it's the most powerful that survives. I say we take the fuckin oil to lower gas prices.
All good if poor people die? Easy for the well-off to say.
the real solution is to stop being an oil dependent nation.EDIT: If we don't take it, then we should shut those environmentalists' asses up and drill in Alaska.
but WHY are you poor? because you're lazy.
pay attention in school, it's free. i went to the same public schools as everyone else and do not hold a college degree.
others in my position flip burgers. why? because they never gave a shit, so now they have to deal with it.
if you can't afford health insurance, get a better job. It's pretty hard to find an employer who doesn't offer it now a days...
how do you get a better job? by knowing things.
oh wait, school.
vicious circle, ehh?
bet you're kicking yourself in the ass for sleeping through history class now, huh?
.
"he has never said that he wants to overturn roe vs wade either."
I've heard otherwise when I've read his platform. It explicitly stated that he did want to overturn Roe vs Wade.
Thats one issue I'm not with him on.
well, you HEARD wrrong. stop watching fax news.
Ron Paul on Abortion
very first thing in the article.... he feels its NOT a fed responsibility.
+1 on getting the US to non-oil-dependent status.
'trailor' is spelled trailer, and some of the most successful/happy people have become such by experiencing and and overcoming adversity. rise above your sitch, man. sounds like you're doing good so far.
someone, please educate me on the process that would have to be enacted in order to overturn roe v. wade - can a president just command it be overturned? i don't think so. checks and bals ftw.